2006-09-02 05:02:50 · 9 answers · asked by 自由思想家 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
ta dangran you yi ge mohawk! yi ge fen hong si de mohawk~! and having a mohawk doesn't make someone a slave to fashion or a conformist, and all you people who said a blunt "no" have no proof, so go smoke your holy pages
2006-09-02 05:34:33 · answer #1 · answered by getyourhandoutmycookiejar! 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I personally think Jesus' sense of beauty and grace would have led him to have long hair in any age. No, I don't see Him in a mohawk, ever. But I know that He would have smiled at them, probably grabbing one or two and shaking the brain that they were attached to (the original cause/use of the Native American mohawk, to shake sense into the heads of youngsters).
2006-09-02 12:07:02 · answer #2 · answered by robabard 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You misuse the English language. The correct phrasing of your question is "... would he have sported a mohawk?"
2006-09-02 12:11:59 · answer #3 · answered by voltaire 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not. Jesus most likely consecrated his hair like many of his time and would not have cut it.
2006-09-02 12:06:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was quite the non conformist, so I can't see him joining something as tired as punk.
2006-09-02 12:08:06 · answer #5 · answered by Catspaw 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes...with purple tips.
2006-09-02 16:28:41 · answer #6 · answered by Denise W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
Jesus was not a slave to fashion.
2006-09-02 12:10:23 · answer #7 · answered by Gestalt 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2006-09-02 12:24:56 · answer #8 · answered by tim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO
2006-09-02 12:09:14 · answer #9 · answered by nustrodomus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋