I named many of the people who I agree with but I forgot many so I won't try it this time. There are just too many.
The B.S. reason I was given was "not a question or an answer".
2006-09-02 05:02:08 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
The only reason I posted this again is because certain people who dislike me because of my political views keep using the "abuse" button as a censor button. I am determined not to let them do it. I will say whatever I want. That's part of the freedom of being an American, something they aren't.
2006-09-02 05:35:17 · update #1
Too many to mention. I notice many were more careful this time in their answers. Most of us remember anyways.
I wouldn't worry about criticism. Look at the source.
I will compliment you on several things. Your efforts to reach some hearts. Often you site your sources so accuracy of your statements are shown. You are understandable to others. You often make main points stand out. Your values are often made clear. And you do not back down from harsh criticism. Good job on those points.
2006-09-02 17:19:51 · answer #1 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I like your tenacity. Keep up the great work! I also see that the opposition has gotten a lot more abusive, and are starting to put up pictures. Of course, I reported them for their "self-portraits."
2006-09-02 15:22:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
then you definitely might desire to be a to blame proprietor so as that your canines would not grow to be pregnant and upload to the style of canines dying in shelters international extensive. In maximum circumstances, inspite of what the vendors of unintended litters might think of; human beings gets a domestic dog, shop it till at last its out of that lovable domestic dog point, then sell off it off in a safeguard or worse. So, might you extremely end it earlier it began out; or in basic terms make the canines go through for something of its existence. A canines that's pregnant and not far alongside that comes into maximum shelters could have their being pregnant terminated by using style of canines interior the safeguard already. those too far alongside would be allowed to beginning. i like canines as lots because of the fact the subsequent individual, however the reality nevertheless continues to be that they are animals, and an animal's existence is nowhere close to close to to having the flexibility to be in comparison to a human's existence. I fee existence too, and thanks to this i might extremely end it earlier it starts than to be certain or hear that a domestic dog wound up in a horrid undertaking or at a safeguard. tell me, have you ever seen that? to blame vendors, people who breed intentionally to extra helpful the breed, and who be sure that potential puppy vendors sign contracts, and are prepared to take back a domestic dog if at any time interior the canines's existence the owner won't be able to safeguard it anymore, etc. won't have unintended litters, and could no longer might desire to terminate a canines's being pregnant because of the fact they understand that the doggies being produced are going to bypass to solid homes. this might't be reported for the BYB and irresponsible canines vendors who enable their canines get pregnant by ability of "twist of fate". twist of fate pregnancies can produce undesirable, and unsound doggies with problems later on in existence. that's fairly not genuine, yet i've got seen it, and that i've got had to handle it as a safeguard worker and canines coach. Get your woman spayed, and eliminate all probabilities of her transforming into pregnant. Then, you will no longer might desire to complication approximately this.
2016-11-06 07:01:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know why this question was removed......if you go into other forums on here you will find the same type of Q's. (I don't see those getting removed or people complaining)
Anyways I agree with just about everyone of the anti illegals/amnesty on this board. There are times I don't agree with the specific words they use, but as far as what their views are,I do agree with that.
2006-09-02 06:20:41 · answer #4 · answered by Hold em Rox 6 · 8⤊ 3⤋
i agree with u and dont think that people have the right to use the violate botton for such stupid reasons
2006-09-02 15:14:28 · answer #5 · answered by Jazzy305 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That Nancy F answer up there is from my baby. That's my kid, and you better not even think of insulting her!
You're in violation again. This is a repeated question. This is considered chatting. This is a personal agenda. This is not a question for the immigration category. And if we wait long enough, you'll start insulting the answerers.
Who are you impersonating today? Sometimes I really feel sorry for you kid, with all the nasty stuff posted against you, but you don't know when to quit, do you? You're right up there with EDNA. LOL
And my answer is I agree most with the people who call you a racist, because you are a racist. Love, Kong!
2006-09-02 06:08:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 8⤋
I see all the LOSERS are crying about your question!!! They expect everyone ELSE to put up with their BS, but then they start playing with the "report" button,when those of us who don't agree with THEM ask anything!!!!!! Could it be the CRIMINAL mentality??? lol!!
I KNEW i was forgetting someone yesterday!!!! I also admire "warrior babe" and "his girl"!!!
2006-09-02 13:44:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
i copied it see the cowards change their tune. and what is barbar-Bananas Are Really Better At Roachie Club?
2006-09-02 08:49:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
For a moment you looked like an impersonater of Julia Roberts. But I guess you can steal anyone's picture off the net.
Go with Coragryph's perfect answer. This is a nonsense type of posting. Nobody cares what you "personally" consider the acceptable posts here. You are also the most immature thinker on board. This is America, remember, and everyone is entitled to their opinion. What makes you, a user who gets suspensions and violations right and left, the decider of who answers here? At age 35, you have a lot of growing up to do yet.
2006-09-02 06:00:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 10⤋
I don't agree with them, i agree with what they are saying..but who an i agreeing with?....lol....i agree with the anti-illegals for the most part...
this is for you Alberto
yes on hr 4437...stop the criminals
2006-09-02 05:46:45 · answer #10 · answered by bllnickie 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋