2006-09-02 03:00:30 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
True. LOL so true.
2006-09-02 03:01:57 · answer #1 · answered by Debra M. Wishing Peace To All 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ha, ha, ha. exciting tale, i benefit from the Christian's conviction. It jogs my memory of the story of Gideon, the place he breaks down the altars of the fake gods. the base line is that no human likes hypocrisy, and the sign became hypocritical. It preaches against faith, the place in actuality Atheism is likely one in all the main heart-hardening religions to date. i do no longer think of that's stealing, because of the fact the sign wasn't taken for inner maximum earnings - it became taken in an attempt to particular the Christian's very own freedom of speech. possibly if room have been made for a demonstration next to the atheist sign for the Christian (actual freedom of speech), he would not have felt the might desire to eliminate the sign, and intensely might have elaborated on atheist hypocrisy?
2016-11-06 06:52:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look at it like this, if you pay taxes, if you pay to license your vehicle, drivers license, inspection stickers( in states that have those), postage stamps, income tax, state tax, or sales tax, the bottom line is, its a tax.
The government has a way of getting into the hip pocket no matter what. I consider it stealing cause I didnt vote to pay those taxes. Look at how much of the cost of a gallon of gas is tax. its about 35% of that cost is state and federal taxes.
Keep the liberals in power and they will keep bumping it up to cover their automatic payraises, their expensive retirement plan and all those congressional junkets they take every year.
2006-09-02 03:06:35 · answer #3 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Since the Republicans took over the government has been just a way to funnel our money into the pockets of loyal Republicans at a terrifying rate. I'm glad I don't have children, because they're going to pay dearly for this fiscal irresponsibility.
2006-09-02 03:06:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dear sweet rebellious Tom, I do not quite understand your statement. Anyone who works long and hard hours to earn a living is competing (whether their salary is $25,000 or 25 million per year). Deal with it and get over it, kind gentle one. Taxes are too high for EVERYONE (except for some of those phony "please donate your money while I donate a miniscule amount" Hollywood types and "they're my wife's SUVs and her outsourced companies" John Kerry types. Bless your loving strange soul.
2006-09-02 03:08:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep, so right - but you've also hit a bigger subject -- a biblical quote attributed to government .... and that's the whole damn story .... the whole reason for organised religion ... power and control of the gullible ignorant masses.
2006-09-02 03:14:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. the government endorses competition except for those exempt under Antitrust laws.
2006-09-02 03:02:13 · answer #7 · answered by badotisthecat 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the government has no competition
2006-09-02 03:02:30 · answer #8 · answered by blank 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yeah! Oh what a statement, LOL
2006-09-02 03:06:58 · answer #9 · answered by NIGHT_WATCH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep!
2006-09-02 03:02:12 · answer #10 · answered by penwrite5 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are an idiot. Fair assessment?
2006-09-02 03:05:53 · answer #11 · answered by wildraft1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋