This is not genealogy, so the greenhouse question shoud be posted somewhere else.
2006-09-03 03:28:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by BuyTheSeaProperty 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Complicated question. I wrote a bit of fiction about an imaginary Island where the people had a more responsible attitude to the greenhouse effect. Go to Soulcast to read it. I forget the title, but it's the one about Zip Island. I throw a link in to my website for free - some interesting stuff on there too. You can make money blogging on Soulcast if anyone is interested. But I just like reading peoples stuff and having them read mine.
2006-09-02 09:12:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mike10613 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The degree of the greenhouse effect is dependent on the concentration of greenhouse gases in the planetary atmosphere.
2006-09-01 23:49:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Country Boy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There seems to be a topic with understanding what technological awareness is in this united states. mutually as what human beings think of with regard to the greenhouse result could be exciting, our critiques have genuinely no impact on regardless of if there's a greenhouse result or regardless of if that's increasing (getting "worse") or reducing. regrettably for all people who have self assurance in any different case, the critiques of politicians even have no impact on climate exchange, even nonetheless they have the potential to unfold disinformation and confusion approximately it. in factor of actuality, the greenhouse result's accelerating to the quantity that human civilization is at grave danger. no longer in centuries, yet interior of here few a protracted time. you could choose to no longer have self assurance that, yet that isn't exchange it.
2016-11-06 06:45:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, we need to have a clean source of energy for electricity, instead of continuing to burn coal on a global scale, such as hydroelectricity or solar as a good example; second, we need to tell the auto industry that we will not continue to be influenced by their advertisement that cars are disposable, sending them a clear message that we need electric cars instead of cars that burn fossil fuels - essentially, it's difficult getting the auto industry weaned from or 'off the tit of' the oil industry.
2006-09-02 05:48:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Another Guy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stop making a machine to make things quicker or easier, do something for yourself for once, the only thing these machines will do is ensure the only time our children see a tree or a river or an animal is online.
2006-09-05 09:08:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Emma O 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Increase the national spend on public transport; a better infrastructure will encourage more drivers to take the bus or train.
2006-09-01 23:46:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by zebra 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The American public needs to be educated by real scientists working in the area of climatology so that they can understand that this is mainly media hoopla and not scientific supported.
2006-09-02 05:54:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by psycho-cook 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is no greenhouse effect, the earths climate has a 10.000 year NATURAL cycle, with 200 year sub-cycles. it warms then it gets cool. global warming is a lie. there is no greenhouse effect.
2006-09-01 23:53:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We(humans) are over 6.5 billions, rising, and are destroying what keeps the world in meterological balance; rain forrests' trees, oceans' algae, the atmosphere's ozone, and still trying to feed, clothe, and house all those billions through expanding production.
...jj
2006-09-01 23:56:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by johnny j 4
·
0⤊
0⤋