English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

well I was wondering if that continues to get to the most extreme conditions ever in how many years it may take, then what can happen to the Earth?

2006-09-01 17:41:42 · 9 answers · asked by JA+JH 2 in Environment

9 answers

First, climate scientists agree that the Earth is getting warmer and that we are a major reason. Some lay people disagree, and those disagreements get in the news a lot, but very few climate scientists disagree. Here's info from a prestigious and unbiased scientific organization, which documents the very strong agreement among climate scientists about it.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686

And a quote from that article:

"Politicians, economists, journalists, and others may have the impression of confusion, disagreement, or discord among climate scientists, but that impression is incorrect."

But there is no agreement among scientists about how fast it wil happen. Some scientists think that it will happen fast (10-50 years) because of things that speed it up like ice melting and exposing ground which heats even faster. That's the position Al Gore supports. Other scientists think it will be slower (50-200 years) because something on the Earth will react against it and slow it down.

The worst that is predicted is that a lot of the coastal areas will go under water, and that changing climate conditions will mess up a lot of agriculture. That's very bad for us, and we need to prevent it, but it's not the end of either the Earth or man.

2006-09-02 18:44:56 · answer #1 · answered by Bob 7 · 0 0

it really is nonsense spread via John Coleman, television weatherman (no longer a scientist). he's been yakking about doing this for years yet of direction no longer some thing ever comes of it. The case ought to get tossed at latest as being without foundation. The kind 30,000 comes from the human beings, dogs, cats, and so on. which have signed the Oregon Petition. via and great they don't seem scientists in any respect. the most admired signers that are (were) authentic scientists are both useless, Edward Teller and Frederick Seitz. Teller died so long in the past that the most recent IPCC record had no longer even been released, so he's infrequently up on the hot technology. EDIT for Silver bear: of direction Al Gore isn't a scientist and he's likewise no longer my hero. the position did you get this nonsense? I suggested no longer some thing about Al Gore, even with the reality that i'm fantastically certain i have suggested in different solutions that he's a political candidate, no longer a scientist, and that i did not imagine his action picture replaced into useful propaganda/rhetoric. My heroes are/were authentic scientists, like John Wheeler, Paul Dirac, Isaac Newton, and so on. do not challenge your own garbage onto me. yet another EDIT for Silver bear's nonsense: you've a good type of nerve to say "you've gotten executed some authentic learn and discovered via now that the conception of guy-precipitated international warming is - at basically right - a fraud. " in reality I have a draw close's degree in Physics, have the equivalent of a draw close's in Atmospheric technology, and could be getting a Ph.D. in climate technology this year, so i ought to say that I have executed some authentic learn, a number of which I presented on the yank Geophysical Union very last month and some more effective of which i will latest on the yank Meteorological Society assembly this month. And basically what learn have you ever executed that proves that is a fraud? examine some blogs? yet again to the unique element, John Coleman is complete of warm air and is not any longer suing actually everybody, because he has no case. he's not any longer a meteorologist, he's an entertainer; Gore is a no longer a climate scientist, he's a political candidate.

2016-12-06 03:25:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

JH, what's happening in that the world is that the present "interglacial period" is coming to it's end and the next "glacial epoch" is soon to begin. We know this because the Earth is on a pretty regular cycle, interglacials generally last 11,500 years and the time for this one, the "Holocene Interglacial", is just about up. It always warms up dramatically before the coming of an Ice Age; in fact in a very complicated way, that's part of the mechanism that brings on an Ice Age. Furthermore, the climate always destabilizes for a few decades before an Ice Age so the weird flipflops the weather has been going through for the past couple of decades is also to be expected. It will balance out eventually and the new normal is going to be damn cold.

I don't know why Algore is saying all the crap that he is, but he either doesn't know what he's talking about, or he's deliberately spreading disinformation for some sinister reason. Humanity didn't start the Cycle of the Ice Ages and we can't stop it. Glacial cycles come from the planet itself and maybe even beyond that; some scientists suspect the glacial cycle is linked in turn to very long-term magnetic cycles in the Sun.

2006-09-01 18:10:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Al Gore invented the environment. It's up to him.

2006-09-01 18:04:52 · answer #4 · answered by soymilk 2 · 0 0

Al Gore certainly knows his audience doesn't he. You don't see him address a group of real scientists!

2006-09-02 08:42:28 · answer #5 · answered by idiot detector 6 · 0 0

Be afraid, be very afraid of politicians. They have a tendency to distort science to their own ends.

Try going to the website www.junkscience.com and look at the science, not the hype.

2006-09-01 18:51:36 · answer #6 · answered by Mr Cellophane 6 · 0 1

Consider the source, and consider the audience.

2006-09-02 09:21:10 · answer #7 · answered by Albert F 5 · 0 0

we will all disintegrate ( NEVER trust Al Gore and global warming has been hashed to death on this site SEARCH QUESTIONS _ GLOBAL WARMING or better yet WEB_CLIMATE CHANGE )

2006-09-01 17:43:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

it will probably be less hospitable to human life

2006-09-01 17:45:56 · answer #9 · answered by atheistforthebirthofjesus 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers