Nope, no cheek turning here. I have firearms and plenty of ammo. I am absolutely ready to defend my country if necessary. Absolutely no question about it.
2006-09-01 14:55:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Carlos R 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Depends.
There are many different kinds of battles that people can face. If someone were invading america I know that, to me, It would matter WHO was invading. If it were someone who could better america I would turn the other cheek, If it were someone who would only make america worse than it already is, I would stand and fight, even though I am no longer american.
There are other situations where turning your cheek is the right answer. Physical battles where fighting back would cause more harm than good. However, I feel that many of the battles that people are turning away from today are battles where we need ot stand and fight.
2006-09-01 15:01:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by happiest_phantom 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Forget about Ann Coulter. Most Americans have took arms and are ready. Are you as a Christian ready to be killed without fighting?
2006-09-01 14:59:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by nflhandicapper 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was one of them that said you should turn the other cheek, But im a weak human, I get mad and do, and say things I know I should not do, I fail God all the time, Im very sure there are those out there, yes that would actually turn the other cheek, but I would probable not remember to do that till after i threw a punch or two. I said Im weak, I hope that he would forgive me though.
2006-09-01 14:59:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by theladylooking 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
like that's been mentioned usa protection stress spending is over six hundred billion 2nd international protection stress spending is china at a hundred+ bn. the main progressed technologies we've 34 air craft distributors while china has under 3 lowly progressed air craft distributors. to no longer point out U.S. armed civilian militias and a civilian gun possession of one hundred ten weapons in step with a hundred human beings. Militias with Armored workers distributors and arranged protection stress techniques as properly as gangs that are greater appropriate armed than maximum international protection stress. it could be a cold day in hell if the U.S. have been to be invaded. something around 35-40% of protection stress spending and 40 5%+ of international gun possession it could be epic besides the indisputable fact that it does no longer be attainable. fortuitously lobbying from unnamed communities has allowed for the civilian disarmament of different international locations it could be very no longer undemanding to take u.s.. China and all its protection stress ought to no longer take our civilian inhabitants on my own ideas you i will upload Russia to that undertaking, we would nonetheless win.
2016-09-30 06:22:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What does being a christian or an athiest or a jew have to do with anything ?
Don't you think that most American soldiers are Christians ?
2006-09-01 14:57:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't trust Ann Coulter with a burnt out match. She's an idiot.
2006-09-01 14:57:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Flea© 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ann coulter is a moron.
Everyone knows that.
2006-09-01 15:01:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
we are being invaded and this is what we do. Not only do we turn the other cheek we welcome them,change our language and laws to suit them, And give them jobs. So theres the answer to your question.
2006-09-01 14:59:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by darkvale 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who is invading? The Canadians? BTW, I love Canada!
2006-09-01 14:54:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Maryam B 3
·
0⤊
1⤋