2006-09-01 13:02:13 · 15 answers · asked by dangerskilzki 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Both has their place. Right now, I'm all about long term relationships.
2006-09-01 13:03:56 · answer #1 · answered by Peace 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I have been in a long term relationship for a long time and I sure do miss those one night stands.
2006-09-01 13:06:03 · answer #2 · answered by jmortiz_22 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would love to have a long term relationship. But I also look at the bright side of one night stands. I can still raise my daughter on my own without him having a say in it. I don't have to clean up after his mess. And at night, I get the bed all to myself. So one night stands aren't too bad. I'm young and still have needs.
2006-09-01 13:05:49 · answer #3 · answered by Yup! I'm a girl! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Long term relationships.
2006-09-01 13:04:02 · answer #4 · answered by 'Barn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both...I think everyone should have at least one "One Night Stand" but long term will make you happy in the long run.
2006-09-01 13:05:29 · answer #5 · answered by sa guy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Long term relationships...you just have to find a way to keep them exciting.
2006-09-01 13:04:12 · answer #6 · answered by vieveia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
long term
2006-09-01 13:06:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LONG TERM RELATIONSHIPS FOR SURE.
2006-09-01 13:03:25 · answer #8 · answered by michelle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i locate it unhappy that a "fling" should be considered as "disposable". evidently there are diverse criteria for "flings" vs "marriage". yet that would not unavoidably make the flings any a lot less extreme, astounding or deep! certainly, i ought to say i have prevalent more effective intensity, interest, sharing, intimacy, ask your self and many different good things in "flings" than many human beings do of their marriages. some marriages are downright dismal. yet human beings keep enduring them. Is there some thing about their semi-everlasting status which makes them any more effective "actual"? any more effective particular? i imagine no longer! I daresay, on account that my criteria for marriage are so complicated to locate, if i did not have the so-referred to as fling (no matter if that is for a weekend or a year), i could not in any respect comprehend the fiery ask your self it really is intimacy! I have made concepts i will treasure and not in any respect will forget. i desire my fanatics can seem again on those reports with equivalent ask your self and also cherish them. even as i ought to say more effective, the important criterion for MARRIAGE is lengthy-time period compatability coupled with lengthy-time period planning for existence. it really is more effective the "marriage" criterion than intensity or love. because it ties without delay into it weathering time. Harriet - i trust you commented on some thing else. i replaced into waiting to disagree with your time period "disgusting" yet i realized you've been addressing the idea that those who should be suitable for a fling ought to no longer be someone to marry. i think some thing totally in yet otherwise. so a ways as i'm worried.... that is that fling which starts the path that ought to in some unspecified time sooner or later bring about a lifelong love. that is perchance that very lady whose eyes into which I gazed and we suggested "allow's percentage this tonight"... perchance we are going to easily keep on sharing... until eventually in some unspecified time sooner or later we not in any respect prefer to allow it pass.
2016-12-06 03:10:31 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm...depends on the girl! She might only be worth a one nighter!
2006-09-01 13:06:31 · answer #10 · answered by some guy in sa 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋