English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What if you had two men in the white house who were curious about things,

Who wanted evidence before making a decision,

Would you campaign

2006-09-01 07:59:58 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

to the first poster, its a silly joke get a life and take your jesus and get off my questions

2006-09-01 08:02:29 · update #1

13 answers

Huh?! What is peeking?!!? Where?!


(I would vote for you - It would be nice if my country's neighbour had 2 smartasses in the office instead of a dumbass)

I VOTE FOR THEM!

2006-09-01 08:04:33 · answer #1 · answered by ηιgнт ѕтαя 5 · 2 0

Hehehe, your added note made me laugh, take your jesus and get off my questions, I'm rolling! Anyway, I would campaign for sure. I've never really been into politics that much, but with you running and what I know of you, I'd be excited to be a part of it. Where do I sign up?

2006-09-01 08:30:30 · answer #2 · answered by ♥ Luveniar♫ 7 · 0 0

definite. If he in basic terms served one term as president. A 2 term president won't run for vp through fact he would desire to grow to be president in an on the spot and that would desire to be unlawful. I doubt any president would choose to grow to be vp besides. Bush (I) and Carter would desire to run for president or vp, yet Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama would be prohibited with the help of the form.

2016-12-18 03:10:59 · answer #3 · answered by marquard 4 · 0 0

Yes, I would campaign. I also want the post of Secretary of Defense. I need to get into Area 51......

2006-09-01 08:05:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'd vote for ya Jim, I think you'd be a good president. Not any worse than Clinton. LOL

2006-09-01 08:05:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd promise not to leave any hanging chads......

Campaign sure... but just don't ask me to make slogans or signs.. I suck doing that..

2006-09-01 08:45:37 · answer #6 · answered by genaddt 7 · 0 0

Is it possible for me to suggest something without you, Jim Darwin, taking offense?

Because I would like to suggest something and not offend you.

The suggestion is that a trait common--though not universal--to agnostics is that eventually it becomes clear that they are more interested in themselves than anything, which is one reason they prolong committing to God.

Jim Darwin's posts are becoming increasingly about Jim Darwin, in other words.

And while there is nothing ipso facto wrong with that, it is telling, in any event.

Committing to God means, among other things, renouncing the glory of self. It is, oftentimes, veiled vanity and pride that keeps us uncommitted to an intelligence greater than our own (and by this I mean God's). Yet the vanity and pride do peek out from beneath the veil, given time.

Yours appears to be peeking.

2006-09-01 08:01:15 · answer #7 · answered by Gestalt 6 · 1 7

There would be someone worth voting for.

As oppose to voting against someone. Which I do year after year, after year after year, after year........after year.

pabs

2006-09-01 08:20:36 · answer #8 · answered by Pablito 5 · 1 0

Depends....does nepotism extend to friends?

2006-09-01 08:08:00 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Mira♥ 5 · 1 0

I want night_star777 as an intern, or I'm not running.

2006-09-01 08:04:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers