English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

you, for asking such a sick question

2006-09-01 05:28:35 · answer #1 · answered by Sordenhiemer 7 · 1 0

Target? We've targets aplenty. They are in the lands of those that either hate us or have weapons that are or could be targeted at us.

Use them? That is entirely different.

Once my son slapped his mother. I slapped him and reinforced that his action was wrong (he never slapped her again). I didn't kill him, much less in a massive and gruesome way. Nuclear weapons are the last resort unless others resort to nuclear weapons first.

2006-09-01 12:32:56 · answer #2 · answered by Rabbit 7 · 0 0

1 - Oh, Antarctica, most definitely!

2 - It would raise the world's sea levels VERY quickly, thereby wiping out places like New York City, Boston, the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, Seattle (why ARE the far left-wing mostly on the coasts, anyway?) and a few other smaller burgs and make for a much nicer country in which to live. Then the super-enviros could stop babbling about global warming as its principal anticipated side-effect would already be in place and they could transfer their anxiety onto some other (real or imagined) "problem".

2006-09-01 12:30:31 · answer #3 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0 1

There's a lot more power in people knowing you have a nuclear weapon than there is in using one. I'd sink some uninhabited island, just to show everyone that I could, and tell them I have a thousand more.

2006-09-01 12:32:38 · answer #4 · answered by Beardog 7 · 0 0

Id destroy my own nuclear weapon.That's asinine to even think about.This is not a toy weapon ,its a decimating
destroyer of life and the world as we know it.I would never advocate its use except in war to protect our country from invasion.
And if you destroy the Democrat party head quarters you will take our your war mongering president too .That's a foolish flippant answer.
And Walter your an even bigger nut.

2006-09-01 12:30:32 · answer #5 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0 0

Los Angeles and Hollywood California, for obvious reasons. But first I'll buy up all the desert land. Then when those cities fall into the sea I will be rich, selling my beach front property!!!!

2006-09-01 12:40:50 · answer #6 · answered by Princess of the Realm 6 · 0 0

I would dismantle and dispose of as many nuclear weapons as I could

2006-09-01 12:26:31 · answer #7 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 1 0

Hundreds of miles above the sky in the night of asia. That is a warning shots for some resilience country to confrom to UN.

If not, next shot will be land smack dead at their houses.

2006-09-01 12:28:35 · answer #8 · answered by Just_curious 4 · 0 1

My first target will be at poverty after which I will target epidemics like aids and malaria. Why ? Coz they are ruining the lives of millions.

2006-09-01 12:24:45 · answer #9 · answered by roy2006cute 1 · 1 1

It would be pretty easy to answer your question speaking hypothetically,I'm sure most of us could think of a few places,but in reality,it would be very different.

2006-09-01 12:41:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The middle east.
obvious resons

2006-09-01 12:27:18 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers