http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/dutch-pedophiles-launch-political-party/2006/05/31/1148956379255.html
Read that - what on Earth is the world coming to....? This disgusts me and I have no idea how that is even POSSIBLE?!?!
["Other politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals,"] YOU ARE CRIMINALS LOSERS
*takes a deep breath* Feel free to post your thoughts
2006-09-01 01:50:00 · 25 answers · asked by ηιgнт ѕтαя 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
One bright spot in the article...
"An opinion poll published today showed that 82 per cent wanted the government to do something to stop the new party, while 67 per cent said promoting paedophilia should be illegal."
I am concerned why 33 percent wouldn't want this **** banned.
2006-09-01 01:59:07 · answer #1 · answered by JerseyRick 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It relies upon on what definition of 'worldwide' you're refering. as some distance through fact the Macrocasm alongside with all the universe, then no. it rather is maximum genuinely not. while you're speaking astronomically as a planet, then particular and no. they say that we are going to be swallowed up with the help of our action picture star at last. interior the history of the universe this could ensue particularly quickly. In our own history strains, it should not be. it rather is going to be 1000's of 1000's or maybe hundreds of thousands of years from now in the previous that happens. although, what i think of you're refering to is the worldwide as all of us realize it in the present day. Our societies are consistently evolving and changing. So, rather the word of the 80's did end, yet there is not any way of affirming precisely whilst that occurred through fact replace is a persevering with. If we do fall right into a melancholy, or have a considerable disaster, then there'll in simple terms be a glitch in our worldwide. some scientist have faith that Yellowstone's great volcano will bypass off interior the subsequent 50,000 years. that would desire to be a extra physically powerful glitch than the two i've got pronounced, yet existence will come across a fashion. human beings have survived one interior the previous. As for what we are use to in existence economically, this has a extra physically powerful risk of glitching our lives on the 2d. it rather is already haveing consequences in different worldwide places. human beings are beginning as much as starve through oil situation...or a minimum of extra so now. If we do bypass right into a melancholy, we are able to might desire to alter the way we live. human beings will might desire to flow nearer to their artwork. extra human beings might own farms. the full dynamic of the country will replace. As for nuclear. risk is that there should not be a nuclear disaster. although, it fairly is not set in stone. Even then, human beings will stay to tell the story. they are going to discover the thank you to conform. So, i think of we are basically a splash f*****, as you place it.
2016-11-23 17:25:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, omigosh, they're going back in time, to the time of Romeo and Juliet (Juliet was 13) and even further back to the time of Jesus (Mary was 12 when she was impregnated, 13 when she gave birth).
Personally I think the "legal age" should be 17 or 18, not 16, but the sanctimonious hyperbole in a few of these answers is a bit ignorant, considering the prevalent belief that "God" chose a 12 year old child to be the "mother" of "his son."
2006-09-01 02:09:23 · answer #3 · answered by Sweetchild Danielle 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Let's see...we have a wannabe cowboy chimp in the White House who has ground our credibility and international reputation into the dirt, we have religious fanatics trying to rework the laws of the land to validate their religions, twisted pedophiles who have organized a political party, lunatics who are happy to blow themselves up to kill people who are different, and people who hate other people for no reason at all.
What are we coming to?
More trial, more contraversy, and more foolish people. We've had them before, and we'll have them after this set of disasters pass.
Situation normal: All F'd up.
2006-09-01 02:07:02 · answer #4 · answered by Scott M 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
In a responsible society children have to be protected, even 16 is too young for sex. No one wants to draw the line anymore and we will see the price to be paid when all these poor messed up peoople go to years of therapy to repair their scarred lives - sickening.
2006-09-01 02:00:45 · answer #5 · answered by Maria b 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Dutch pedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and the legalisation of child pornography and sex with animals, sparking widespread outrage.
The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party said on its web site it would be officially registered tomorrow, proclaiming: "We are going to shake The Hague awake!"
The party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether.
"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.
"We want to make paedophilia the subject of discussion," he said, adding the subject had been a taboo since the 1996 Marc Dutroux child abuse scandal in neighbouring Belgium.
"We want to get into parliament so we have a voice. Other politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals," Van den Berg told Reuters.
The Netherlands, which already has liberal policies on soft drugs, prostitution and gay marriage, was shocked by the plan.
An opinion poll published today showed that 82 per cent wanted the government to do something to stop the new party, while 67 per cent said promoting paedophilia should be illegal.
"They make out as if they want more rights for children. But their position that children should be allowed sexual contact from age 12 is of course just in their own interest," anti-paedophile campaigner Ireen van Engelen told the AD daily.
Right-wing lawmaker Geert Wilders said he had asked the government to investigate whether a party with such "sick ideas" could really be established, ANP news agency reported.
Kees van deer Staaij, a member of the Christian SGP party, also demanded action: "Paedophilia and child pornography should be taboo in every constitutional state. Breaking that will just create more victims and more serious ones."
The party wants private possession of child pornography to be allowed although it supports the ban on the trade of such materials. It also supports allowing pornography to be broadcast on daytime television, with only violent pornography limited to the late evening.
Toddlers should be given sex education and youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves. Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal, the NVD said.
The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public and promotes legalising all soft and hard drugs and free train travel for all.
Reuters
SO DISGUSTING EWWWWW THEY SHOULD GO AND **** THEMSELVE WITH SHOVEL AND STOP TOUCHING ******* KIDS BECAUSE THEY ARE SO UGLY THEY CANT GET ANY BETTER THOST EFFING FREAKS I MEAN WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THEM I HOPE A ******* FAG. KILLS THEM ALL AND HAS SEX WITH THERE DEAD CORPSE AS THERE OWN FAMILY WATCHES
2006-09-01 01:52:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire
In a democracy anyone may make a political party, and they can stand for what they wish - whether you, or the majority of people agree with it or not. This doesn't mean they'll get any votes, and they are indeed very stupid for standing up and saying "I agree with it", because now the police know EXACTLY who to investigate for child abuse.
2006-09-01 02:02:42 · answer #7 · answered by Mordent 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It is a known fact-ah, that thy might shall strike-ah with all his might-ah. And the dead shall walk the earth-ah. - Preacher McNugget
Now seriously, you need not bother with such dark thoughts. Live your life and experience what's still great about it...
2006-09-01 12:50:37 · answer #8 · answered by The Dutch 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Once the floodgates were opened to accept the GAYS ,did you really think the rest of the ,PERVERTS wouldn`t show up for acceptance also.
They have the same right to Express themselves as the GAYS Do.
I just hope everybody goes back into their CLOSETS and die .
2006-09-01 01:57:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Unbelievable! Who is going to protect the children.
2006-09-01 01:54:44 · answer #10 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋