English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think it might be all that testosterone that's lead to so much hatred, war and bloodshed. But I could be wrong. What say you?

2006-08-31 16:20:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

My apologies. I guess I'm confused. I thought God was the father of Jesus Christ. I've been wrong before.

2006-08-31 16:29:37 · update #1

12 answers

I guess... but what happens to Her when it's that time of the month? Look out!

2006-08-31 16:24:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

This idea has been tried in the past with the same results. a big mess when we had matriarchal societies. The mortal women in charge were just as war like and underhanded as the men are under the patriarchal society we have today.
The only way to do as your question implies is to have a combined male and female society.
But since the CREATOR of ALL THINGS knows duality maybe that is part of what we as mortals have to do is wage constant battle for one cause or another.

2006-08-31 18:17:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I've worked with all men, and all women. My experience is that men are more open when they have a beef with you,giving you a chance to apologize and make nice, where the all women scenario is intense and very political. There's all this drama and espionage with grudges being held over the smallest slights, and a scorched earth approach often being taken.
Who's to say we women wouldn't want to drop the bomb?
When I think of someone circumcising me as in subsaharan muslim communities I could become dangerous myself. Let's Hope God is a benign asexual being.

2006-08-31 16:36:36 · answer #3 · answered by robyn o 3 · 0 0

lol no, god isnt in control of people. and god cant be proven to have a gender, after all he has no need for one, unless your believing in multiple gods, or that god has affairs with his angels. God is just seen as a man, because in the time of these religions births, men were considered superior during this time. but moreso its a generalization statement, such as if i were to walk up to a group of men and women and say hey guys. im not saying hi to all the guys, im generalizing women in there, same kinda thing, we are just giving god something to call him by.

2006-08-31 16:24:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The women in each country would spend all day gossiping about the women in the other countries, and they would not have time for war. They would scream and curse each other, but never use the bomb.

2006-08-31 16:24:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

WHAT MAKES YOU THINK HE ISNT WE WILL KNOW WHEN WE GET THERE AND YES GOD IS THE FATHER OF JESUS

2006-08-31 16:35:33 · answer #6 · answered by jk poet 4 · 0 0

Are you implying that God ISN'T a woman? Infidel!

2006-08-31 16:25:56 · answer #7 · answered by hquin_tset 3 · 4 0

God is not human, so no!

PEOPLE MAKE THE WORLD THE WAY IT IS NOT GOD

2006-08-31 16:26:43 · answer #8 · answered by mother of 7! 3 · 0 0

God isn't even human so how could he have a schlong or a set of boobs?

The only reason we don't call God an 'it' is because that would be objectifying him...

2006-08-31 16:23:09 · answer #9 · answered by MM 4 · 3 2

nope because men are basically dolts

2006-08-31 16:25:51 · answer #10 · answered by Ariel 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers