English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-31 11:10:59 · 43 answers · asked by Apostate Rebel 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Please check this question ouhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlrZZGsi55LVhe3POWsUldnsy6IX?qid=20060831151647AA5nNsVt

2006-08-31 11:19:22 · update #1

43 answers

Dear sweet mindless Apostate, children need an education; my answer once again is "NO!" May your gentle witless soul be blessed.

2006-08-31 15:46:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It's irrelevant. The attendance isn't the problem, the ignorance is. What we need is to get rid of the fool's bet Voucher system and give real money to parents so they can stay home with their kids and make sure they get fed and listened to. The average school system spends 8 grand on 'systems' which ignore most of the kids in favor of a few. Just think what a parent with 4 kids could accomplish with $32,000 and a whole year to spend with their kids. Granted, it assumes a minimal education on the part of the parent, but with that kind of money, the parent would have time to learn to read, too.

2006-08-31 11:15:50 · answer #2 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 0 0

No because they are not mature enough 2 decide what's best for them. They are children who need 2 get their education so they need 2 know when they need 2 get to class on time. If it's abolished, kids would think they don't have 2 come 2 school.

2006-08-31 11:17:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A friend of mine is a Dallas JP, the court that hears truancy cases. He would often give them probation, but make them write a research paper as a condition of the probation. He has some funny stories of what has happened a few times ;-)

2006-08-31 11:18:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Education is good, we just need to get it right, and fix up what we have. At least this psuedo-attmept at teaching is beniftal to alot of kids but, sadly, not all.

No school would greatly reduce the amount of kids that make it in the world, and would upset what we have worked for so far.

2006-08-31 11:14:34 · answer #5 · answered by Benanen 3 · 1 0

specific, it would. a newborn might properly be mature for his or her age, and that they could be to blame, yet understanding is needed for understanding, and that they at the instant are not going to get it sitting around at homestead, except they're of course voracious readers. college is approximately understanding and coaching. it is likewise approximately socialisation and getting to know skills that are needed interior the workplace later on. We study to community, and to communicate with some efficency, in college. that's because of the fact of our instructors and because we are in an enviorment with our friends- we can't probable communicate up or all the way down to them. And mutually as you could study solid straightforward experience and such from existence reviews, you at the instant are not likely to examine a thank you to stability a checkbook or a thank you to characteristic, for that remember, except somebody teaches you first. college regulates it, provides all human beings an equivalent risk to examine (a minimum of theoretically, yet i'm no longer likely to argue over the state of the learning gadget right here) and provides them the prospect to examine. How do you anticipate youthful toddlers to make options? How do you anticipate them to have the understanding and foresight? you do no longer. You study from existence, and you study from the errors of others, and you study by ability of gazing others- back, the factor of faculty

2016-11-06 04:25:14 · answer #6 · answered by falls 4 · 0 0

Yes! All them dam public schools is doing is teaching my kids to get gay! I have half a mind to home school em so they can learn about the glory of God without having men hump each other in font of them. I'd get the wife to home school em but she doesn't obey all that much anymore since some dam libril got to her with all this womens rights nonsense. I have to fix my own dam dinner now, pretzels and beer.

2006-08-31 11:18:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i think it should be required up to 9th grade, because after 9th grade u pretty much know how multiply and got a pretty good understanding of the government. although even if it was abolished completely it prolly wouldn't make a damn parents would still make them go which i cant really blame you need education

2006-08-31 11:19:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. Parents should raise kids that aren't idiots. School doesn't make them any more intelligent.
Let's just keep degrees required for jobs and watch the retards die out.

2006-08-31 11:18:00 · answer #9 · answered by shmux 6 · 0 0

Education should be mandatory, school should not! My sons are home schooled and they are considered intelligent. Some kids do well in a school setting and others do not.

2006-08-31 11:18:55 · answer #10 · answered by Debra M. Wishing Peace To All 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers