Why do christians think that proving evolution wrong (impossible to do) will prove them right?

Question

It won't. You should concentrate on finding some of your own evidence to support your own hypothesis instead of trying to criticise scientifically proven fact. Say no to jesus http://www.saynotojesus.tk

Answer 1

Along those lines.. the population of the USA has the second highest percentage of people in the world who believe in creationism. I find it shocking that so many in the US totally discount evolution, which is no longer a theory. Way way way too much evidence to discount.

Answer 2

Probably because many people have used "evolution" as an excuse for every type of vice one can think of (Like Hitler and his "final solution", or the torture & imprisonment of religious people in the various Communist countries, etc.).

Since so many atheists use evolution as a way of mocking Genesis, many Christians fight back by attacking evolution.
.........................................................
...First, even if the theist could not muster good arguments for God’s existence, atheism still would not be shown to be true. The outspoken atheist Kai Nielsen recognizes this: "To show that an argument is invalid or unsound is not to show that the conclusion of the argument is false....All the proofs of God’s existence may fail, but it still may be the case that God exists."

Second, the "presumption of atheism" demonstrates a rigging of the rules of philosophical debate in order to play into the hands of the atheist, who himself makes a truth claim. Alvin Plantinga correctly argues that the atheist does not treat the statements "God exists" and "God does not exist" in the same manner. The atheist assumes that if one has no evidence for God’s existence, then one is obligated to believe that God does not exist — whether or not one has evidence against God’s existence. What the atheist fails to see is that atheism is just as much a claim to know something ("God does not exist") as theism ("God exists"). Therefore, the atheist’s denial of God’s existence needs just as much substantiation as does the theist’s claim; the atheist must give plausible reasons for rejecting God’s existence.

Third, in the absence of evidence for God’s existence, agnosticism, not atheism, is the logical presumption. Even if arguments for God’s existence do not persuade, atheism should not be presumed because atheism is not neutral; pure agnosticism is. Atheism is justified only if there is sufficient evidence against God’s existence.

Fourth, to place belief in Santa Claus or mermaids and belief in God on the same level is mistaken. The issue is not that we have no good evidence for these mythical entities; rather, we have strong evidence that they do not exist. Absence of evidence is not at all the same as evidence of absence, which some atheists fail to see.

Moreover, the theist can muster credible reasons for belief in God. For example, one can argue that the contingency of the universe — in light of Big Bang cosmology, the expanding universe, and the second law of thermodynamics (which implies that the universe has been "wound up" and will eventually die a heat death) — demonstrates that the cosmos has not always been here. It could not have popped into existence uncaused, out of absolutely nothing, because we know that whatever begins to exist has a cause. A powerful First Cause like the God of theism plausibly answers the question of the universe’s origin. Also, the fine-tunedness of the universe — with complexly balanced conditions that seem tailored for life — points to the existence of an intelligent Designer...

Answer 3

Tom,

Do you know what a fact is?

Evolution isn't even a theory let alone fact. Since it can't be tested at best it is a model and a poor one.

The evidence of a Young Earth is huge.

There is simply no evidence for evolution.
Try leap second, leaving moon, shrinking sun, low dust on moon, footprints of man and dinosaur side by side.

Answer 4

God might properly be shown outdoors of evolution. those are some proofs: The Bible has a staggering inner solidarity inspite of being written over hundreds of years by ability of individuals of fairly some social instructions, or perhaps languages. The prophecies interior the Bible have come genuine. consisting of ones that have manuscripts that are older than the fulfillment of the prophecy. This is composed of the prophecies in Daniel 2 which conceal Western background to the modern-day, the single that Jericho could be rebuilt, however the builder’s oldest and youngest sons might die throughout the time of the development, and the single approximately Babylon by no ability being rebuilt. in case you opt to disprove Christianity and Judaism in basic terms bypass rebuild Jerusalem. listed under are another motives for theory: The Jews have been a small band of those that lived interior the portion of Mesopotamia interior the process the Phoenicians, the Lydians, etc. Even the Babylonians have been absorbed or destroyed. Why do the Jews proceed to outlive and prosper with their custom intact inspite of in basic terms approximately standard hatred? As an beginner historian i might say that the Jews might desire to have been wiped out earlier written background. even nonetheless, as a Bible pupil i'm no longer bowled over. It became in basic terms because of the fact the Bible predicted it could possibly be. This comparable argument might properly be made for the survival of Christianity. The Christians have been a very small band of an off shoot of a unpopular faith. they might desire to have been wiped out by ability of the Jews and / or the Romans interior the existence of the apostles. yet, in basic terms 3 hundred years later, we stumble on Constintine changing to maintain his empire for splitting because of the fact there are too many Christians for the Roman military to subdue them. Anthropology Biblical cities no longer recorded in secular works have been stumbled on interior the situations the Bible predicts. very own evidence: What i understand for specific is that God provides me peace previous my mind's eye, and is slowly changing me from my bitter, violent previous right into a kinder, gentler individual. i understand which you do no longer supply this form of evidence lots credibility, yet in my journey it won't be able to be denied. Psychology: The venom of the anti-non secular is likely one in all the final proofs of religion. regularly human beings do no longer combat against issues they have not got self assurance in with super interest. They do combat against issues they understand are genuine, that they might't manage that way.

Answer 5

Aside from their arrogance, evolution is the thing that hits them the hardest now. Before that it was a round earth, before that it was the earth moves around the sun. Think you get the point!

Answer 6

no, but its like athiests trying to prove christians wrong (which is impossible to do as well) =\ you cant prove whether god exists or not, and you cant prove how the earth was formed.

Answer 7

AGREED

*checks out the link*

Answer 8

Well said.

Answer 9

We are 'STILL' waiting for you to back up your proof of 'YOUR' facts!!! YAWN.........