English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

my 4 year old expects me to know everything!

2006-08-31 04:01:58 · 17 answers · asked by xxx 3 in Education & Reference Preschool

17 answers

Forrests have more trees, closer together, than with woods, more light gets to woods.

2006-08-31 04:08:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 0

Forest Vs Woods

2016-12-18 04:16:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Woods Vs Forest

2016-10-06 04:41:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

A forest is an area with a high density of trees (or, historically, a wooded area set aside for hunting). Actually, many definitions of a forest exist [1]. These plant communities cover large areas of the globe and function as carbon dioxide sinks, animal habitats, hydrologic flow modulators, and soil conservers, constituting one of the most important aspects of the Earth's biosphere.

Forests are differentiated from woodlands by the extent of canopy coverage: in a forest the branches and foliage of separate trees often meet or interlock, although there can be gaps of varying sizes within an area referred to as forest. A woodland has a more continuously open canopy, with trees spaced further apart, which allows more sunlight to penetrate to the ground between them

2006-08-31 04:05:31 · answer #4 · answered by DanE 7 · 2 0

Forest
A dense growth of trees, plants, and underbrush covering a large area.
Something that resembles a large, dense growth of trees, as in density, quantity, or profusion: a forest of skyscrapers.
A defined area of land formerly set aside in England as a royal hunting ground.

Wood
The secondary xylem of trees and shrubs, lying beneath the bark and consisting largely of cellulose and lignin.
This tissue, often cut and dried especially for use as building material and fuel.

A dense growth of trees or underbrush covering a relatively small or confined area. Often used in the plural.
A forest. Often used in the plural.

It seems the difference is wood is the singular and forest is the plural many more than one wood

2006-08-31 04:08:05 · answer #5 · answered by pooh bear 3 · 0 0

I grew up in the country, and I believe the forest is more vast an area than the woods. The woods is usually more local, I would think. Other than that, the terms are usually used interchangeably.

2006-08-31 04:07:07 · answer #6 · answered by bassbredrin 2 · 1 0

Woods can be a few acres and a forest can be a few thousand acres. Don't know if there is a between, however, with the timber industry being what it is, a forest can now be just a few trees!

2006-08-31 04:09:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A forest is larger than a wood.

2006-08-31 04:09:41 · answer #8 · answered by Lady Penelope 3 · 0 0

Forests usually take up a vast expanse. A wood can be a small field of trees.

2006-08-31 08:57:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

My opinion ...

A forest applies more to a place where small & big wild animals/reptiles roamed among thick foliaged trees .

A wood applies more to a place with many trees but habitated by smaller animals.

Any objections from Yahoo folks..?

2006-08-31 04:06:59 · answer #10 · answered by Phantom of the Opera 4 · 1 0

i am a chinese,but still have a try , a forest may be larger or smaller than a wood in area ,there is a novel named Norwegian Wood, according to the chinese translation, i think a wood is larger
in area

2006-08-31 04:10:40 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers