Well, I guess if you think killing innocent people, keeping people in conservation camps and starving them, and just being one of the most evil creatures to ever walk this earth makes you good, then I guess in your opinion Hitler was a great man.
2006-08-31 11:42:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Naples_6 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
To try and be sensible no he was not a good man. He was however a clever man. Blair would be ecstatic if the country followed him in the adoration shown to Hitler. His economic policies were of little consequence. His only end was world domination. That was a different time the world was a different place. He will never be seen as a good man. He was in my opinion suffering from severe mental problems. Magabwe is similar yet we let him carry on.
2006-08-31 03:43:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by deadly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe he have some good idea in the very beginning. He was doing a lot of good things for the Germany people and the world and Germany people really admired him. Roosevelt use to think Hitler was a great man. Hitler did a lot of good thing in his early career. However he got so obossive with his power and learned to hate those who he consider "weak" and start by killing mentally challenged, disabled, or defected baby. That's when he across the line and in end killed many million of people all over the world.
So my answer is he was a good man in beginning but something happen during his time as a leader that made him goes crazy and kill a lot of people. Which in end make him a evil person.
2006-08-31 06:48:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Was Hitler a good man...obviously no! Because I know his actions cost the lives of millions of innocent people (Jews, Gypsies, Poles, Russians, Ukranians, White and Black Americans, British, Canadians, French, even Germans and lots of others).
Was his economic polices good??? also No!!!
He did not control the Reich air ministry, which resulted in there being many aircraft designs, good ones (like the Amerika and Ural bombers) and even better ones (like the Me262) being cancelled or delayed. Result = Defeat in the Air for the Luftwaffe.
He kept changing his mind on Tank production, which resulted in there being not enough King Tigers, Panthers or even Panzer IVs to use to fight the Allies. Result = you guessed it...Defeat with the Soviets bashing into Berlin.
He kept changing his Mind on the Navy too...he did not know whether its battleships and carriers or U-Boats. Result = You guessed it again...Defeat with the Allies bombing all the U-Boats and battleships to Davy Jones' Locker.
There's a lot more which I do not feel like illustrating since they all say the same thing = Hitler was an economic and Military moron!!! Why you support him...I will never know in the infinity of all things stupid.
2006-08-31 04:29:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by betterdeadthansorry 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
To be serious, Hitler's economic ideas depended upon excessive deficit spending (no, much more extreme than we are seeing today!), which required that a relatively wealthy segment of the population be held hostage so the extra money could be extorted. Because of the lack of hard currency, German industry could not really modernize beyond what it could produce on its own, so much of their technology remained labor-intensive, thus bringing the necessity of huge amounts of slave labor.
The autobahn was largely an economic bust, because very few people actually had cars. The whole Volkswagen idea was never really meant to provide private cars to ANYONE, but instead was another scam designed to rob the German workers of more of their earnings and channel them back into either the war effort or (more likely) to be skimmed by Goerring or Himmler, etc.
2006-08-31 07:22:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by sdvwallingford 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In answer to your question was he a good man. For gods sake how can you ask that, he was the cause of a world war and the death of millions.
Economic Policies, he did do a lot of good for germany and the german people but that is unfortunately dismissable due to his crimes.
Was he a Good man, still can't get over the idea that someone could think that.
2006-08-31 03:36:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Phil J 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was a very convincing politician
but a poor military leader and even worse as an ecconomist.
He brought back Germany from depression mainly by using the same anti depression scheme that was applied by Roosevelt. He brought the country back on it's feet by huge investments in roads,civic improvements and public facilities and of course a huge weapons build up with no foreign trade to balance it. That's like building a house on quicksand. By 1939 His books were clearly in the red. The only way he kept going till 1945 was by declaring war on their neighbours and steeling their resources and funds.
2006-08-31 04:32:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by peter gunn 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler was not a good man. He was evil. He fixed up Germany after World War I however he killed many people in the death camps. He did great but terrible things.
2006-08-31 04:12:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by KSJTam 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was a stupid, evil man with who initially followed the economic plans of his big business backers and made some major points in that way. He gained confidence and stopped listening to anyone. His failures in the the economy were covered up by the war he started. A war that he wanted to start and in which he was supported by the military, politicos and businessmen in starting.He simply did something they, all of them, did not want. He started the war two years early.
2006-08-31 16:55:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not a Hitler fan at all and I am not Jewish and I do not condone what Hitler stood for in the least.. However if you looked at this individual strictly on his leadership abilities, he was a genius !
It's just too bad he could not have put this ability to better use.
2006-08-31 04:57:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by j H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋