Is it true that Clinton's America was filled with boundless hope for a better future?
Is it true that Bush's America fears an endless war with "terror"?
Is this an example of "by their fruits will you know them"?
2006-08-31 01:39:09 · 12 answers · asked by bobkgin 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Clinton killed a lot less people.
2006-08-31 01:42:02 · answer #1 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
endless war with "terror"?
Clinton and Bush really could not act until American soil was attacked which did happen 9/11under Bush's watch.
The USS Cole attack and the attack on the Marines in Lebanon and other previous incidents that occurred under other administrations, could not count for the US government to start war.
But getting away from the current smaller things, soon all war will cease when the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ's reign begins.
Dan 2:44 And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that shall never be destroyed, nor shall the kingdom be left to another people. It shall break in pieces all these kingdoms and bring them to an end, and it shall stand forever,
Mic 4:3 He shall judge between many peoples, and shall decide for strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore;
2Pe 3:13 But according to his promise we are waiting for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells.
2006-08-31 01:53:48 · answer #2 · answered by rangedog 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When the world trade center was attacked under Clinton, I guess he responded with love and did nothing to detour the terrorists.
While other CEO's of any company would have been removed from their position for abusing someone under their control, he was handled with love and then lied, and was handled with love again.
There is a time for war and a time for peace. Wish Clinton would have handled his term better, we might not have had 9/11
2006-08-31 02:10:44 · answer #3 · answered by tobinmbsc 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's the way I see it....Clinton was more humble (he knew he wasn't perfect). Clinton also respected the negotiations of his staff that fostered peace between other nations....Those qualities contributed to hope for a better future....
On the other hand, Bush has amazingly stubborn pride and believes he is right to his own demise....And, hopefully not to our demise as a nation.
2006-08-31 02:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by Denise W 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
During the Clinton Administration the terrorists did have peace. They are able to do some great planning and had hope for a better future.
2006-08-31 01:44:22 · answer #5 · answered by WhatIf 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Two presidents, The first president initiates a bloody, costly, unending war on false premises and approves covert policies of illegal detentions, kangaroo courts, extraordinary renditions, torture and warrant less wire-tappings of thousands of Americans. The second president lies about hooking up with an intern. QUESTION - Which one should be impeached?
2006-08-31 01:57:10 · answer #6 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
look at the incident of Waco Texas. This was conducted under clinton.
2006-08-31 01:46:04 · answer #7 · answered by Sky_blue 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Clinton's world was filled with bj's from someone other than his wife. Clinton's world was filled with self-indulgence, hedonism, narcissism, and financial death to anyone who dared oppose him or was rich and wasn't one of his friends.
2006-08-31 01:46:24 · answer #8 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're still in denial about 9/11.
2006-08-31 01:46:08 · answer #9 · answered by Answers1 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes the Republicans are all about hate and fear.
Hate Homosexuals, Arabs, Muslims, Communists, Blacks, Mexicans, Atheists, Jews, Poor People, Unwed Mothers, any goup that is unpopular, that they can get enough people to hate so that they can get elected.
2006-08-31 01:45:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋