Why would homosexual acts be as normal as heterosexual acts?

Question

Could you give me one logic reason?

It should say natural.

Answer 1

I think it would be best to take a serious look at history. Where you find homosexuality, you soon find the end of a nation.

As I researched the topic, I found that most nations that began accepting this abnormality crumbled soon after.

The only logical thing I can think of is that because the family is the foundation of a society, once it becomes less valued, societies then begin to crumble.

So looking at it that way (the societal impact), I would say that since you see a nation build up strong without it and later find it fall when it is accepted as a "norm", then we find that the homosexual act itself is a slow destroyer and therefore is not normal.

Answer 2

By quantity of the general population, it is not normal. Animals in both zoos and in the wild have been observed performing homosexual acts. Not all of them, just the same ones over and over. I would have to say that if some wild animals are born gay, then gay could fit in the idea of natural. It has been documented, it does happen. How do you explain it? Some gay dude taught that deer to want to bugger and be buggered? Nope, it's a wild animal that would run away from any approaching human. It must have been born that way. Now, this could put a different spin on it. What genetic abnormality makes some people and some animals desire the same sex? I don't know, some scientist would have to figure that sh!t out. Since the population of gay humans has always been under 10%, why the conspiracy theories? Even if every single one of the gay people marched for their own civil rights it would never equal the number of black Americans who marched for theirs. They lack lobby, unless you count Hollywood. You are a fear-monger and you probably think more about gay people than a 'straight' person should.

Answer 3

Excellent question. I had to read it twice, because you answered it yourself with the word NORMAL. Now, my doctorate is in Psych, but I remember the myriad of sociology classes during undergrad. One of my friends done his thesis on homosexuality in other cultures and I was amazed. There are tribes (today) in Africa where the male is REQUIRED to have a wife and a male partner. Ancient Roman nobles were given female and male servants to perform certain pleasures i'm not going to get into. It's all about the NORM, what is considered normal.

We learn at a very young age what is required of us to survive, many of us are lucky enough to have the perfect environment to produce a conservative, heterosexual male. Others, without the male father figure during the early sexual development years (2-6 yrs old) may not be so lucky.

I stand behind (as do many of my associates) Freud's theory that we are born Polymorphously Perverse [forgive the spelling] and that it is up to the environmental to mold sexuality. If you were born and raised into a tribe of orgy indians who slept with men and women from the age of 16 on, then this would be customary, tradition, ala normal. Here in the US, we are taught mono-hetero relationships - time, culture has not always been that way.

Answer 4

I can't imagine why "normal" or "natural" would be a concern when having sex*, but anyway, you might be surprised to find that homosexual acts are the same as the heterosexual acts. I'm pretty sure they kiss, and caress each other, suck on and lick various body parts, rub against each other, and of course penetrate various body orifices with the penis or with fingers...pretty much just what we straights do when we're having heterosexual sex.

There's your logic: A=A. If A is normal then A is normal. Q.E.D.

* I use the "is it fun?" test myself, and frankly, I think there's something just a bit, well, perverse about people who base their sexual activity on "normal" or "natural".

Answer 5

Define 'normal'. If it only means 'common' then no, homosexuality is never likely to be as normal as heterosexuality. If it means 'morally neutral', then yes, homosexuality is as normal as heterosexuality.

OK, if you meant 'natural', then everything is 'natural'. You can't use the term 'natural' to define what is or is not morally correct, without painting yourself into the corner of defining things like flying aircraft to be immoral.

If you want to call homosexuality immoral, then by all means do so, but that will never be anything other than your subjective opinion, and it will never be any more or less valid than anyone else's subjective opinion on the matter.

Answer 6

They can be similar, but never the same. Heterosexuality is the natural order of things, and homsexuality is a matter of personal preference and/or confusion.

Answer 7

They are "natural" in the desire to sexually satisfy and be satisfied by your partner. Only those who wish to discriminate and seperate themselves as being somehow "better" make distinctions and accuzations of same-sex intercourse being "unnatural" and "abominations".

Answer 8

Because you guys stole our sex styles from us. YOu got into Oral and anal and liked it, then didnt give us any credit for it, and proceeded to persecute us for something you couldnt think of!

Answer 9

They are not. So what? Does that make it wrong? Perhaps if more people did it then it would be normal.

Answer 10

because they are the same human being as you are and the difference is only while having sex