English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this an argument for anything?
They can't be just a manifestation of the mind, becuz the universe was there long before man came along.



what do u think?

thnx.

2006-08-30 22:30:02 · 14 answers · asked by meta-morph-in-oz 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

so, they r just symbols intelligent creatures use to describe the world?

2006-08-30 22:50:21 · update #1

14 answers

They are part of God's creation.

2006-08-30 22:42:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

If you hold a rock three feet above the ground and drop it, it does not fall because it is obeying the laws of gravity. It doesn't know nor does it care that a physical law exists. It also could not disobey a law of gravity. The laws come from scientists and mathematicians because they use them to predict outcomes.

They are only manifestations of the mind. Before man existed rocks did not exist because the idea of a rock is again a human conceptualization. The universe is. There isn't any more to it than that. There was of course what we now call mass and energy, but without us to name it such things were not.

What we call rocks existed, but they were not rocks because "rockness" is a human construction and categorization. It has no independent existence without the viewer.

2006-08-31 03:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by OPM 7 · 0 0

The laws of physics and math are derived through the application of the scientific method, which doesn't go exactly like this but this gives you the idea:

1) Observe
2) Theorize
3) Experiment
4) Measure
5) Conclude
6) Repeat as necessary

2006-08-30 22:36:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

a famous individual FOR this question!! super factor! i like it! right here is my take: The 'rules' that we've stumbled on exist purely in our physique of reference. there is no longer something that asserts those rules exist in each universe or each length. as a remember of actuality, you will possibly anticipate the guidelines to alter as you moved interior the process the size. to illustrate, interior the 5th length, time might mean some thing else completely (i think of. i'm a sprint a amateur to those ideas). besides, my factor is this: The rules artwork for our purposes. technological awareness might desire to function interior of a framework, in any different case we would in basic terms spin our wheels. with out categorizing issues, and making ordinary 'regulations' we would nevertheless be interior the Stone Age. are you able to think of waking up each morning and attempting to create hearth from scratch? with out recognizing that water isn't flamable, we would be sitting in a cave, rubbing a branch of wood in a puddle, thinking why there became no hearth. As our understanding grew, we found out specific issues that have been constants. In math, a million plus a million is often 2. In physics, dropping a 10 kg. steel ball and a a million kg. steel ball on the comparable prompt will effect in a simultaneous collision with the floor. with out recording those outcomes and utilising the information to construct our base of understanding, we would not have the potential to strengthen. Now...a logician comes alongside and says,'the place did numerous those rules come from?'. while a scientist won't be able to answer, the logician says,'properly, that kind of makes you a sucker for following them.' no longer genuine. by ability of peeling back the layers, humankind might locate out precisely a thank you to bend or destroy those rules. yet, with out defining them, we've no risk of understanding them.

2016-11-06 03:22:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The laws of physics and maths are methods used to quantify to some suitable measure of precision the universe around us.

They are arguments for nothing.

I don't understand the last of your comments, about manifestations of the mind.

2006-08-30 22:56:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

What you think of as laws of physics are really just observations of probability, and what you think of as laws of mathematics are really just an abstract language that we use to describe the non-abstract real world. The laws of physics and maths don't actually exist except as convenient abstractions in our own minds which help us to understand reality.

I think what this means is that everything in the universe - even existence itself - is all probabilistic. We live in a universe in which, purely by chance, the probabilities associated with fundamental physics happen to lead to stable matter, formation of stars and planets, and the evolution of life. Physics and maths are all about describing this particular randomly created universe.

2006-08-30 22:42:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Laws are just our language of understanding the surroundings.

Even language is just some vocal or written symbols created by us human to help us communicate and exchange knowledge.

Laws change with time, as our understanding to the world changes. you can read history of science and notice that clearly, Newton's Laws are now called (Classical physics), came the quantum and now we have 'modern physics'.. do you think world has changed?! No, it's just our understanding to it.

Same thing with most branchs of science.

2006-08-30 23:10:57 · answer #7 · answered by ParadoX 2 · 0 0

I think that these laws are certain principles that cause order in the universe, and I believe that Gods laws are similar concepts, but in a spiritual sense....God is the energy that causes life, higher thought processes, knowing the future, etc. and there are certain laws that are involved with reaching these states...

Religion has tried to define them from man's perspective and has completely missed the mark, and actually has created chaos in the name of God...But the laws of God can only be described by the spiritual who experience the phenomenon.

Unfortunately, being that we are humans, there are few in our history that have ever given wholly to explore and achieve the higher spiritual concepts that are available....It is kind of like higher math/science, most people aren't interested. We are too busy satisfying our senses.

2006-08-30 22:50:04 · answer #8 · answered by Denise W 4 · 1 2

The stars are the insperation, the breeze the motivation, and the free will of man to quest for understanding. Physics is derived and applied many times before formalized religion, stone henge for example had to be counted, two rocks can hold up one, you need 3. Math in its purest form has been around since man himself. One man plus one woman equals a baby, or two, or three, ect. Since the exhistance of procreation math will sustain after its end, and the only thing more pure, or old is God.

2006-08-30 22:42:13 · answer #9 · answered by Benjamin G 2 · 1 2

But they ARE manifestations of our minds - an attempt to find ways to measure our surroundings to predict what will happen next and what we can make happen next.

These surroundings were here before we got here. Only life forms measure their qualities and activities. Nature doesn't otherwise have any concept of laws or measurements.

2006-08-30 22:40:18 · answer #10 · answered by Grist 6 · 2 1

Well scientists say that the universe is random, The laws of physics are exact and are seen in great precision.

2006-08-30 22:38:27 · answer #11 · answered by Sky_blue 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers