Since most of the evidence that police found on a crime scene heavily rely on finger prints and use the blood sample (DNA) to determine who have commited a crime, do you think that we should get a DNA sample from everyone so that the police will know who did the crime?
2006-08-30 19:23:28 · 5 answers · asked by Travis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
no, it i too expensive, it can made a small country bancrupt
2006-08-30 19:35:16 · answer #1 · answered by Henry W 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, no, no. DNA isn't the proper all be all that you imagine that's. Juries initiate to take heed to about DNA and their brains close off. besides to, the technology isn't practically as good as you imagine that's. those figures with regards to a million in 10 billion are frequently incorrect. besides to, the administration communities changed into once sure the data frequently do not comprise certain communities. operating example, many indian tribes aren't any represented in the administration communities. As such, certain interior of sight human beings have a much more beneficial valuable danger with a tournament. also, you ought to share each and each of the alleles that are counted with someone. As such, if that man or woman you share the counted alleles with commits against the law, notwithstanding the tournament they have is with you, you'll have quite some explaining to do. And law enforcement officials do not pay interest to you. once they have their concepts made up, they are going to attempt to get you to admit and faux confessions are truly problem-free (in accordance to the U. S. Dept. of Justice, besides, yet what do they recognize?). besides to, you leave DNA everywhere each and each of the time. What in case you leave your DNA in the incorrect position? The question isn't the technology. The question is often the fix of the DNA and what approaches are used. law enforcement officials and their CSI associates will make it look like they are infallible and they in no way make blunders in the sequence and there is in no way any bypass-an infection. yet bypass an infection in rampant in the actual international. you recognize, I actual have not something to cover. My problem is with the authorities and how they botch what they do each and each of the time. And, frankly, what I fail to comprehend is how all of us imagine that regulation enforcement will continually do a supperb pastime, even as something else of the authorities stinks and is genuinely innept. Frankly, all authorities is inept, regulation enforcement and each and each body else. i do not choose my DNA in the authorities's database. they are going to screw it up in a roundabout way and that i ought to easily as quickly not be the sufferer of their screw up.
2016-11-23 15:36:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No we should not ! It is an invasion in to our privacy. If today we allow DNA tomorrow they will ask our blood tests for HIV and like every other thing they can think of...
2006-08-30 19:32:07 · answer #3 · answered by Olga 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
police state do that
2006-09-01 07:01:24 · answer #4 · answered by aldo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont know. but i think it might help easier. but not sure if sure in the right way
2006-08-30 19:28:51 · answer #5 · answered by jwtaz1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋