Thats a definate yes!! from me, The most important thing here is that you both are happy!! and if you both are happy it creates a happy imviroment that reflects on your children and there upbringing. If the woman wants to work and is happy doing so, and the man is willing to take on the so called homemaker roll...and is happy doing so , then there,s no problem.
having a good job can be rewarding , raising a family and watching your children grow is the most rewarding ! Go for it!
you will be well rewarded....But remember comunication, respect & support between both partners in whatever they do is the key to happiness.
2006-08-30 16:31:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by doodah_di 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
for men, being jobless is not an option for me. I need someone who is enough of a man that he'd rather be a checkout boy at Target until the right job DOES come in. I've heard "If you're waiting for your ship to come in, quit! Jump into the water and swim out to it!" and in my experience, every guy I've known who' just can't find a good job" doesn't have the common sense to understand that a low-paying job over several months is still SOME income. I don't mind being poor with a man who has great potential. But I won't be rich on my own salary and have a housedaddy. Some might and that's fine for them, but not for me.
2006-08-30 23:02:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hot Lips 4077 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you mean that he can't find a good job, but he has A job, then I would still support my man. My man is a great guy, and if I happen to be the breadwinner, then I'll accept that role. I would like to be anyway.
2006-08-30 23:02:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Golden Scepter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
umm.. I make more money than my husband.. I was the main bread winner for a while and there is nothing wrong with it. But he can not be a free loader. He better clean the house take care of the kids run errands and have dinner waiting when i get home. (which he does by the way) It is whatever you feel comfortable with but make sure you bring in enough that you don't need any money from
him.
2006-08-30 23:01:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by tohellwitu 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
HELL NO!!! I'm not going to use my hard-earned ca$h on a man who's probably not going to stick around for long. He's gonna start small, wanting the more expensive beer instead of the cheap stuff, but then it will grow and bite you in the butt. He's going to expect you to take him out for a steak every night of the week, and you will crack under the financial responsibility. Any man who can't take care of himself just isn't worth it.
2006-08-30 23:04:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've been the main breadwinner in the relationship for a while. It's a struggle sometimes, he likes to spend more than I do. And he does work, he's just been waiting for a chance to move up. It will balance out and he IS a great guy.
2006-08-30 23:02:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by msuzyq 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would for a short period of time. I would give this man a reasonable amount of time to find a job. If he "can't" find a job it's time to let someone else support him.
2006-08-30 23:00:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥dream_angel♥ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's nothing wrong with switching roles as far as who is the financial supporter and who takes care of the family, if his ego can handle it and her job can support it then have at it. I know my hubby would like nothing more, but i like things just the way are for now. GL
2006-08-30 22:59:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by whitebeanner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I Would as long as....
1. He's TRYING to find employment.
2. He's being productive in any and all other aspects.
3. He's not settling into the current situation.
2006-08-30 23:03:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bianca 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do support my husband, financially. He is a very good man, a fantastic father, a wonderful cook and my best friend. He works part time outside the home and leaves very little for me to do at home. Cooks, cleans, laundry, kids...... he does it all. We just look at it as a sort of role reversal. It works for us and we are both extremely happy. Depends on how you look at things I guess.
2006-08-30 23:07:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by lisa m 1
·
0⤊
0⤋