I seen a question 2 nights ago...........?

Question

and on this question, the person asked why are women more agreeable to the Gay thing than what men are?..........
OK.........So I'm asking why is it that all men even those who Belive have a problem with the Man on Man thing but seem to look over the Woman on Woman thing.............Is not this a Sin also?.......Two wrongs don't make a right........right..........?

what are your veiws on this issue?
and I don't wanta here the Woman has a beautiful body thing either......

...................=)

Answer 1

I am a man. I am married and I am a Christian. I am not excited by homosexual acts between two women. The thought does not excite me, and I have no desire to see such things. I will not say that I am not tempted to look at any woman other than my wife; I am tempted, and I try with all my heart to resist those temptations. I am successful the great majority of the time, do not look at magazines, online junk, movies, etc.

I have no desire to see two women engaged in what I feel to be wrong behavior. It does not excite me because I know how strongly the Bible says God feels about such things. And, it seems completely unnatural to me. There is no excitement there for me. And yes, I have seen these things to know what I am talking about. Even before I really started trying to live for Christ, and was not careful about what I watched, seeing two women engaged in intimate behavior did not excite me; I was revolted and turned off. I am very thankful for that.

Someone wanted a man's opinion; there it is.

Answer 2

Surely what you mean is that you _saw_ a question two nights ago, not "I seen a question".

Now, I haven't had a chance to look over the Woman on Woman thing, but I'd bet that they're having sex together. If that's the case, then I agree with you - I don't want to hear that the Woman has a beautiful body either. I want to SEE it. Both of 'em, in fact.

Unfortunately my views on the issue have always been blocked by curtains or closed doors. Yes, I'd say that's definitely a sin. Two wrongs don't make a right, and if the Woman on Woman thing is wrong, then we shouldn't be closing the doors on it, and if you can get all the other guys involved in that Man on Man thing so I can get a good front row view of the Woman on Woman thing, then I'd be really agreeable to it.

Does that answer your question?
=========================
I got a real kick out of the person below who wrote that men misinterpret scripture for their own benefit. If this is the kind of benefit I might get, I'd have long forgotten entirely about the existence of scripture, and if there's any guy who'd consult scripture in that kind of situation, I'd say he had a really serious problem, and probably needs to sit down with his priest for a real Man to Man.

Answer 3

It is quite hypocritical, that men that are not gay, wouldn't even imagine looking at a male gay couple, but would love to see a lesbian couple or menage et trois. They are both sins, but different ones, and different perpetrators.

The gay guys doing the gay act, are committing an abomination, like bestiality is an abomination.
The straight guy watching the lesbians, is committing the sin of lust.
The lesbians are committing an abomination as well, but I don't remember seeing it spoken as an abomination in the bible.


RE: Mister: In Romans 1 :26 about the woman doing something unnatural, couldn't that also be interpretted as being a prostitute? That isn't natural, and it isn't what a woman's sexual organs were intended for.

Answer 4

actually the bible teaches that both are an abomination.... so your correct it is a double standard.... from a Christian perspective if we accept the Bible as the infallible word of God... then neither is acceptable
Romans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

Romans 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Answer 5

Woman on woman thing - well just what kind of respect are you going to get bedding 2 woman at the same time - its most guys fantasies, duh!

Man on man thing, men just dont like seeing it as it makes them feel uncomfortable.

Women dont get too bothered by any of it as we just get on with things.

Answer 6

Men misinterpret scriptures for their benefits. Homosexuality is wrong for both sexes. It is a great sin.
/

Answer 7

Im unsure about it being sinful..

but Straight guys like and are attracted to women. So a guy looking at a naked man probably wouldnt feel anything one way or another. But watching two men engage in sex would be disturbing. But with women we are already attracted to them. Seeing a Naked women we would get arroused, Seeing two naked women engaged in sex would be extremely arousing. its a matter of what "turns us on" guys do not turn us on. women do. therefore alot of us like watching to women engaging in sex, thats why it is more socially acceptable to us

Answer 8

I believe that both men and women should be respected for their sexual orientations - be it heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, or asexual.

Personally, I'm not a fan of gay porn, but I don't judge them for making it.

If you want to know about why people like certain types of pornography, that question may be better directed to the Sexuality forum.

Answer 9

heres how i see it .. u only u have about 85years here.. if ur happy being gay .. BE HAPPY

lifes 2 short

Answer 10

2 wrongs don't make a Right...BUT.. 3 Lefts does :)P

In the light of what has been said, let's consider the outcome of practicing sin. Multitudes think that walking an aisle, signing a card, and sending one's photograph for baptism constitutes a salvation experience. Soothed and salved by such religious pilgrimages to the altar or prayer room, they continue the practice of every abominable degradation known.

Regardless of their decadent lifestyle, all is well because, once upon a time, they made a beeline to the altar. Unfortunately, all they gained by it was "exercise," not an "experience. " The "move" made, the practicing sinners rest in an unexperienced experience and they will die as unconverted converts. How deceived they are! How sad they will be at the judgment when Christ cries, I NEVER knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity (Matthew 7:23). As I say such convicting truth, I realize that some sin-laden world lings are angry. They are crying, "Christian liberty, Christian liberty." Ah, but Christian liberty is never a driver's license to steer one's life into the pathways of sin! Others lament, "We are under grace and thus are able to do anything and everything." Ah, but grace does not allow for a lifetime of disgrace! The "Apostle of grace" dogmatically teaches this. This is not open for opinion.

Strange as it may seem to some, Paul's "grace" message concerning sin is identical to John's "legalistic" discourse about iniquity. Why not? God wrote all of the Bible. He used Paul, John, and others -- even their personalities and vocabularies -- but He guided every word into place ( 2 Peter 1:21). As a result, Paul, as well as John, makes it clear that one cannot love sin, desire sin, chase sin, live in sin, and check into a sinless heaven. Though any Christian can commit any sin at any time, Paul nevertheless concludes that there must be evidence of a "new nature" constantly battling against an "old nature" if one has been born again. No evidence -- no experience with God! It's that simple.

This is so, because the Spirit of God becomes "grieved" ( Ephesians 4:30) and "quenched" ( 1 Thessalonians 5:19) when believers sin. The believer, in turn, shares the grief produced by the indwelling Spirit. Then, if he continues in sin, he is "spanked" spiritually ( Hebrews 12:6) and may "die" prematurely ( 1 John 5:16), going home "ashamed" ( 1 John 2:28) and suffering the loss of all rewards -- being saved as by fire (1 Corinthians 3:15). It is foolish, to teach that Paul's "grace" proclamation allows one to live in sin. If this alone can't at least capture one's attention, something is bad wrong.

If, at this point, one is still unconvinced, Paul's following warnings should settle it once, for all, and forever.(IF a person is seeking Truth). Hear him in 1 Corinthians 6:9,10: Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not [SHALL NOT. That's right, shall not!] inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators [premarital sex experimenters and "trial marriage" proponents], nor idolaters, nor adulterers [extramarital flingers and swingers], nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind [homosexuals], Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards [social tipplers who tipple one too many], nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Paul again warns in Ephesians 5:3-7: But fornication [premarital sex], and all uncleanness, or covetousness [love of materialism and filthy lucre], let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints; Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.For this [you] KNOW, that no whoremonger [immoral sex practitioner], nor unclean person [smutty jokester], nor the covetous man, who is an idolater [money lover], hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. [None? None!] Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things [sins] cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. Be not ye therefore partakers with them. No doubt about it. Depraved, debauched, decadent practitioners of sin inhabit the lake of fire for all eternity ( Revelation 21:8).

One more judgmental alarm is sounded by Paul in Galatians 5:19-21. He says, Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things SHALL NOT [What? SHALL NOT!] inherit the kingdom of God. Such grammar is so simplistic and understandable that further comment is unnecessary. It all convincingly says, he that practiceth sin is of the devil.

Does all this mean, then, that practicing sinners have no hope? Perish the thought! God loves sinners and sent His Son to Calvary's cross to shed His blood for a world of wicked inhabitants. This blood, which flowed so freely from a love-filled Savior, cleanseth from ALL sin ( 1 John 1:7). Because of it, a great number of Corinthians described in 1 Corinthians 6:9,10 as fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, homosexuals, thieves, covetous, drunkards, revilers, and extortioners were eternally forgiven as verse 11 proves. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. This is what the "second birth" did for them and will do for you today if you receive Christ. Remember, Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved (Romans 10:13).


The entire book of Romans is written for Christians.

Rom.Ch.1
26) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27) And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet

28) And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29) Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30) Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31) Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32) Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

When God inspired this to be said , He closed it with a PERIOD. He didn't leave it with a question mark as to be opened for opinion.
.