yes,, of course they should not be there,, but we are where we are, and we know that the reason was based on lies from the president,, so our troops should come home,, our policy does not work, the world knows Bush lied,, a global war based on a lie,, yes the US was attacked by terrorists,, but they weren't in Iraq,, they weren't Iraqis,,, da//////////////
2006-08-30 12:28:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The question isn't while it starts off yet while it surely ends. i think of Obama's present day plan for a "to blame" withdraw would not get all human beings out until eventually 2010. and that's in simple terms the "wrestle" troops. there is a few imprecise stuff a pair of base and a "strike tension" for "emergencies". i ask your self what sort of strike tension isn't made up of wrestle troops. of direction, this plan must be problem to alter. between the audio device on the Demo national convention promised that we'd stay in Iraq as long as Al Queda grow to be there. it is exceedingly humorous in case you think of approximately it in view that Al Queda purely went to Iraq while we invaded. i'm exceedingly advantageous Al Queda intends to stay in Iraq as long because of the fact the U.S. militia is there. (purely a droop) If Iraq is your considerable reason in the back of helping the Democrats,, i may be feeling fairly hosed if I have been you. Wasn't Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Congress meant to have curbed this Iraq element back in 2006? yet i'm advantageous there are greater significant themes to fret approximately. /specific we are able to / desire/ for/ exchange/ on a number of those different themes.
2016-10-01 02:43:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They shouldn't have gone there in the first place. Yes, they should get out NOW. But Bush and Cheney won't withdraw any American troops until Cheney has a rock-solid, iron clad arrangement in place to get all of Iraq's OIL so that he and his Exxon-Mobil buddies can get richer and richer and richer. Only after he's made that deal with the new Iraqi 'government' (which he helped install) will Cheney allow Bush to bring troops home. -RKO-
2006-08-30 13:30:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I believe we are getting out in 18 months, that's when the next election is going to be held and no Republican will win the Presidency if we're still entrenched in Iraq.
2006-08-30 12:44:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by choyryu 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Even if democrats were to take over the gov't it would still be impossible just jump right out because our hands are tied. If you look back Colin Powell said if we dont finish it and end it w/ in 6 months then we will be stuck there and it looks like he was right. If GW Jr. was as smart as Sr. then he would have done the same thing and notice that he is getting stuck (although it is to late to get unstuck).
2006-08-30 15:01:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by chip24333 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
From my perspective, leaving just because of insurgencies, kidnapping and Cindy Sheehan would be wrong. It sends the wrong message to the world not to mention, to terrorists. It would be like showing them that we fold under pressure and therefore, make us a soft target and even make us a more delightful target for attacks be it from terrorists or hostile countries.
Pulling out because soldiers are being hurt would be as disgraceful as what the Philippines did when one of their citizens was kidnaped.
Let's not put our soldiers' sacrifices in vain. We should stay until we are ready to leave.
2006-08-30 13:07:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by `STaTiC- 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
somebody up there is deluded... i seriously doubt u will be seeing the troops leave iraq for years ... maybe decades ... the US has been wanting a base in the middle east at least since the 6 day war in Israel ... theyre not going to give it up that easy .. and believe it, all the stories you hear out of iraq are jaded, there is no free press there and alot of the stories are concocted
2006-08-30 12:26:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I would hope so. It was a mistake to go in but, once there, we have to finish the job. Hopefully, we can get the Iraqi police and military up to strength and ready to take over soon.
2006-08-30 12:26:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by williegod 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes
2006-08-30 12:25:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Metallicat 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
its an illegal unconstitutional war should we get out soon?
well if you break it you bought it the American people failed to do there duty they allowed congress and the executive branch to violate the constitution and engage in an illegal war, now the American people will have to pay for that mistake for years and years with blood and money. sorry but if you break it you bought it if we leave without fixing it then we will have the same mess that the Russians created in Afghanistan.
2006-08-30 14:55:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rich 5
·
0⤊
1⤋