Atheists apparently have their own fairy tales.
2006-08-30 07:12:21 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hey {Bula'ia Aratyme} guess what evolution states... it says that life came from muddy pools after it rained on the rocks for millions of years... so atom by atom, a single cell formed with DNA(better than our best supercomputers) with the ability to reproduce, by oddless chance-
"wow that sounds completely stupid, but God is not involved, so lets believe it, after all it is a "science" "
... so practice what you preach.... hey you got a little somthin in your eye, it looks like a log... so why don't you pull it out first, before you attempt to remove any splinters from other people's eyes... Thanks...
God bless you and yours...
Evolution is nothing but a popular fairy tale, commonly accepted as fact by those who will believe in anything short of insanity and beyond than in God...
Fact: DNA cannot create new information, it can only coppy and shuffle it, resulting in different variety among each species, sometimes information is lost, resulting in abnormalities- cancer etc...
Theory- all life evolved
Problem: DNA does not allow evolution, only variety on opposite ends of the gene pool...
FACT: life cannot form from non-life...
we already talked about that.... evolution contradicts the facts
FACT: nothing can form from nothing...
Theory: all matter, energy, laws of gravity, light, speed of light, particles formed from magically after a particle smaller than an atom exploded, that came from nothing, all by oddless chance....
Problem: Science says that energy cannot be create nor destroyed by natural means...
most everything is made up of atoms... particles of the atom in its nucleous, detract and have no charge.... so if by some miricle that particles, from nothing, formed a stable nucleous and an electron orbit traveling at insane speeds, at the same time, before those particles despersed into infinity.... guess what, that's only 1 atom...
THis facts pretty much deals the death blow to evolution...
ODDs of evolutionary scenario- less than zero...
Well all of the facts are in conflict wioth the theory, so how else did we get here?
Creationism... which leads to a Creator...
can you accept that, many cannot, they would rather have the truth as they see it, over the facts as they are...
the facts point to God, not to oddless chance...
for those of you that believe that there is no God... that's not fact, that's just your oppinion... and apparently your oppinion is based upon a popular SCIFI lie...
It is a choice to believe in the facts, as it is a chioce to believe in God... you have faith in them or not...
now that you know the facts, what will you choose to believe in?
Popular "psuedo science-[evolution]"
or Real science " creationism"
it's your choice, but sadly many have chosen blind ignorance and false science over the facts...
God bless you and yours.
2006-08-30 07:47:11 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Agappae 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the evidence for the evolution of existence is nicely documented. we do have the answer for that. the first existence, all of us recognize from fossils, seems a minimum of three.5 billion years in the past, and that is very slightly it for the subsequent 3 billion years all you've is unmarried celled organisms. then about 600 million years in the past the first multicellular existence advanced and then evolution took off. the fossil list shows that the older you bypass the better the fossils get, complicated sensible mammals in simple terms look in truly youthful rock strata. and we do have the transitional varieties between each and each of the important communities; from dinosaurs to birds, from reptiles to mammals and so on. certain there have been gaps even as darwin first proposed his theory yet he envisioned that they could be filled by using destiny scientists. and we've been busy over the most suitable 100 and fifty years. DNA evidence proves one hundred% that we share a difficulty-free ancestor with the apes, and also you ought to guage the DNA of two species to reveal how some time previous they shared a difficulty-free ancestor and that's thoroughly per what we ought to anticipate if evolution were actual. the different area of your question you're truly asking what led to the large bang. nicely we do not recognize, we've thoughts yet they are fullyyt theoretical. the adaptation is we admit we do not recognize. unknown skill unknown, it ought to continually be unknown no matter if i do not in my view have self assurance that. yet creationists do make a declare, they declare they do recognize because some 2,000 365 days old e book suggested so. we are not attempting to instruct something immediately, we do not have adequate evidence to modern a case for what led to the large bang (all of us recognize it got here about, that's nonetheless taking position immediately, we are in basic terms not sensible what lit the fuse) so we are saying that's an unknown.
2016-11-23 14:40:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you really this primitive or do you pretend to come directly from the dark ages
man was created by an Anunaki who was known as the creator ,after several attempts ,as slaves to mine gold for them
the increasing intelligence is incidental
Neanderthal,cromanom,homoerectus etc ,they all lived in the same place at the same time near the oldest known gold mining site in the world
it is you who believe the fairy tales of the Anunakis descendants the illuminati .who invented these fairy tales so that they could control the people who succeeded the Adams race ,which they created.
Namely us
and a lot of us (you are one of those)are still hopelessly under their mind control
more thoughts in the 2nd page of this question
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsBo5guYHMK678_sDMbSWbTsy6IX?qid=20060802152308AApcO2z
2006-08-30 07:29:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The evolution of one species into another doesn't make sense. Sure if a monkey were a piece of clay it can be knocked into human form. But what about all the software in the brain? How to convert XP into Vista by making random changes in the code? Or maybe that's how M$ does it :)
2006-08-30 07:33:01 · answer #4 · answered by debarun p 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No.
complex molecules developed self-replication.
critters developed.
More and more kinds of critters developed from them.
Eventually fish.
Then some fish started spending time on land.
Their decedents...
why bother. You obviously have no desire to actually understand what scientists (not all of whom are atheists, BTW) have learned about the development of life on this planet, or on the origins of humans, so why should I bother to try to explain it?
2006-08-30 09:07:31 · answer #5 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Negative. Man is still in a (metaphysical) primordial ooze.
2006-08-30 07:17:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
That's a strangely Freudian image.
2006-08-30 07:17:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If this is the spearhead of intelligence, we're in trouble!
2006-08-30 07:17:03 · answer #8 · answered by ZombieTrix 2012 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no are u stupid, it happend out of millions of years of evolution. look into some research first before u jump to a conclution even a 5 year old wouldnt make.
2006-08-30 07:19:29 · answer #9 · answered by god_of_the_accursed 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I agree with Rick.
This is nothing but a straw man.
2006-08-30 07:17:51 · answer #10 · answered by mikayla_starstuff 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋