The person with the sense and courage to recognise stupid propoganda (ie.creation "science") when he or she hears it.
2006-08-30 11:01:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by elitetrooper459 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm pretty convinced by the answers and questions here that Evolutionists would definitely outwit, outlast, and outplay the creationists. As for which individual would actually win the game? I'd say dvlsadvct.
2006-08-30 06:23:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spookshow Baby 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well, this is certainly a creative question!
I think the one that would be able to outwit, outlast and outplay all the others is the one with the most interfaith understanding- that is, the one who can see from the point of veiw of the most faiths... they would have such broad horizons, that anything would be possible for them, therefore, they would be the best prepared for anything!
2006-08-30 06:24:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by aht12086 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I initially got here right here on yet another account in April or would of 2006 to troll the region. That grow to be my purely reason in the back of being right here. I in simple terms had to stir the pot slightly, brew up some hardship, and have slightly relaxing. Then I met Debra M and and a Muslim person by utilising the call of Poki Poki . They have been so forgiving of something I pronounced that I rapidly have been given a case of the guilts and beat a hasty retreat. some months later I back to earnings approximately different religions and religious paths (A). i'm nevertheless right here for that reason, yet I stay specifically for the buddies I surely have made. ((((((Christy))))))
2016-10-01 02:24:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolutionists are far more self-sufficient and used to the idea of getting along without help from others. As such they would probably be much more independent. Creationists probably would work together as a group better, but in the end it would come down to an evolutionist...
As an aside... poor Dr. Cheesehead, don't you know, Katy prefers to be on the bottom. ;)
2006-08-30 06:53:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, from a humorists' side of view -- the evolutionists because they won't spend the whole time praying for help rather than taking action and doing something about it...
But truthfully, it depends on the specific individuals. Some are more resourceful and have certain helpful experience that could be possibly more helpful that whoever is on the opposing team.
2006-08-30 06:23:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Phoenix's Mommy 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Which ever team has the best bowlers. That is one nut they have yet to crack on Survivor, and I just know it's coming. I can feel it. I might watch that.
Maybe a cage match might be fun too.
(Yes, I have Katy on top of me, again! We really have to stop meeting like this, people are starting to talk...)
2006-08-30 06:45:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually I think it would be more interesting to mix the tribes rather than having them segregated and then see who washes out. I can think of a few regulars from both sides that would probably do very well.
2006-08-30 08:22:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by genaddt 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends what the contrived challenges are. "Team Mendicancy" vs. "I'll Eat That for $1" Round 3: The Actual Body of Christ.
2006-08-30 06:23:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Creationist of course. In the end God prevails.
2006-08-30 09:55:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Outwit - evolutionists.
Outplay - evolutionists.
Outlast - creationists. Too stubborn to back down.
Can we vote them off the planet? "Science has spoken..."
2006-08-30 07:38:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by Kenny ♣ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋