English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It would be sort of a moral imperative, don't you think?

2006-08-30 04:25:59 · 29 answers · asked by mutterhals 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

You guys are really doing all you can to thwart that humorless christian strereotype....

2006-08-30 09:06:38 · update #1

29 answers

Wow, that sort of pushes nine out of ten buttons, doesn't it? Can you hear the bells and whistles?

2006-08-30 04:31:00 · answer #1 · answered by Harris 4 · 2 2

I think abortions are wrong anyway. There are so many people in this world that can not have children. Take me for example- I am 27 years old my husband and I were married for years and I could not get pregnant. The doctor told me the only option I had left was adoption. It was a big strain on our marriage and we ended up divorced. So to me abortion should never be an option.

2006-08-30 11:35:08 · answer #2 · answered by texashoneypot_25 1 · 0 1

Anti-Christ does not have to be a demon child like in the film Omen. It really means someone that opposes Christ. In this world that already runs to billions of people. An athiest is someone who opposes Christ as saviour of mankind so in affect is anti-Christ.

2006-08-30 11:29:47 · answer #3 · answered by Spadesboffin 3 · 1 0

According to the Bible, he is either coming, or is already here on Earth. Many people will not be able to distinguish him from other people, in fact, he will work his way thru the ranks, and make a name for himself, under false pretenses, coming across as the second coming of Christ....

2006-08-30 11:34:32 · answer #4 · answered by LorHod36 3 · 2 0

No, it wouldn't be. Abortion is murder.

Jeremiah 1:5 (King James Version)


5Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

2006-08-30 11:29:13 · answer #5 · answered by Investigation Specialist 4 · 3 0

This is another halarious question! It is the perfect question to ask fundamentalist christans who profess that abortion is verboten ALWAYS! I am still LOL about this question. How about this one too:

"Christians, would it be OK to get an abortion if one was impregnated with a fetus that had no brain or nerve endings or heart?"

2006-08-30 11:30:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I don't see why you would have to. If your baby is the anti-christ then someone else would kill it after it was born anyway. No responsibility for you.

Although I suppose then you might get attached to your baby - anti-christ or no anti-christ - but then that would your problem right?

2006-08-30 11:32:32 · answer #7 · answered by hbennett76 3 · 0 1

no abortions are a sin, and not good for your health either if something goes wrong. Have the baby, u can put it up for an adoption after or actualy raise it yourself. you never know it may actualy be a life changing experience for the better.

2006-08-30 11:29:54 · answer #8 · answered by ..;..;.. 4 · 1 1

1) You would not know if that person was in your womb.

2) Each person is accountable to God, regardless of who gave birth to whom. (the mother would not be held accountable for her children's sins, only her own)


Answer = No. Abortion is never OK.

2006-08-30 11:32:43 · answer #9 · answered by Juliart 6 · 1 0

Innocence is the key to heaven, a child that dies before birth goes to heaven because it has not sinned, but an unloved unwanted child will grow up to be a sinner! So go ahead!

2006-08-30 11:32:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No it wouldn't be okay,It would still be murder.
If someone was impregnated with the anti-christ it would be God's will.

2006-08-30 11:31:45 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers