2006-08-29 20:59:02 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
If Bu$hCo can make money on the deal, and the general public will tolerate it to any degree, they most certainly will.
2006-08-29 21:03:20 · answer #1 · answered by CK 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Any attack will eat up men and resources. Utterly destroy any good will that lingers in the region for the US. It will be resisted by even those Irani's who like the US and dislike the present Irani regime. No one likes to see his country invaded and why the American army and political leaders can't see that no matter how many bloody noses they get is beyond me. It will be a long grind if the Irani's are the only ones that fight or a blood bath if surrounding nations get involved by supplying men and materiel from a state of neutrality. The long term result will be the pull out of US troops in the Middle East and the lose of the oil fields in Saudi Arabia and Iraq. This result will adversely effect the social and economic conditions of the USA. How bad this will be will depend on the leadership of the US. One can only hope that none of the present "leadership" are in a position to contribute to the conversation. Therefore as it is a course of action that has no win result and can only be viewed as stupid the shrub will attack Iran.
2006-09-01 00:53:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush will never do it an if he does America will suffer a lot i dint like their support of terrorism but again the AL qaede was trained by the USA to fight the soviets. America has already spent alto of money on Iraq and it is a big mistake America could have invaded Iraq in the 1980's when Saddam actually killed people but it didn't because they wanted Iraq to be a capitalist state. and going for Iran is another big mistake. Iran will never attack USA unless provoked because they know what'll happen next
2006-08-30 05:22:58 · answer #3 · answered by YR1947 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran has less to worry about from the US. But much more from Israel. Israel just purchased some subs from Germany which are designed for second strike capability. That way if Iran attacks they will be able to erase them from the map.
Not that I have anything against the Iranian people, but the leadership is crazy and need to change. If they continue to provoke the region I think they make themselves a target. So I think the Iranian people should change the government from within, if they don't it will be changed from the outside.
2006-08-30 04:06:09 · answer #4 · answered by Jon H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Iran continues to pursue nuclear weapons, if Iran continues to say it wants to completely erase Israel from the map, if Iran continues to support/fund/train/arm terrorists and militia groups in Iraq, if Iran continues to build an ICBM capability, if Iran continues its anti-ship missile programs, if Iran continues to support and control terrorist organizations across the world, then yes, I believe President Bush will attack. And yes, I would support him.
Afterall, what's the alternative? Repeating Europe's mistakes and ignoring fascism? Allowing Iran to control the Middle East and have to go back in 5 or 10 years to fight a far more costly war? Allowing a nuclear exchange between Iran and Israel? Tolerating terrorism? Allowing Iran to control 40% of the world's oil production? Allowing Iran to threaten Europe and later the US with nuclear weapons? Inviting another Cold War?
Do any of the above sound appealing?
Pull your heads out of the sand, find a backbone and do some reading people:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/index.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/index.html
http://www.cfr.org/publication/9362/
Or search for your own sources. The info is readily available.
2006-08-30 04:32:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It will be really stupid to attack Iran...So he probably will...
But I don't see how he could win this war...US has already troops in Afghanistan and Iraq and things don't look to good there...Another war would be lost from the start...especially against Iran...
I don't think Iran should be attacked,I really don't see it as a threat...
2006-08-30 04:06:23 · answer #6 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush already committted an error in Iraq and is repenting for it and try to discount it as "failure of inteligence"! That too after damaging a country to the maximum extend.
While it happend, US citizens were not aware of the seriousness. Now after seeing the daily arrival of body bags, they very well can asssume the effects!!
If Bush underestimates Iran, and enters in an encounter, of course, it will be a major tragedy in US history and the coming generation willl not forgive him for his sadist nature and hatred on Islam.
For any such an action, US has to prepare with Dollar Bills, that I feel is scarce now due to amazing expenses and looting (by local contractors & US middlemen) in Iraq.
Global policing will be a mole on US's efforts to control terrorism related activities, as it triggers the activists to go ahead further to chase the illegal & illegitimate occupiers (US + UK)through voilance!!
2006-08-30 04:11:31 · answer #7 · answered by SESHADRI K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush isn't going to attack Iran. He just doesn't have the resources to do so.
2006-08-30 04:03:43 · answer #8 · answered by suraj_d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance...
After the Butt Kicking Lebanon got from Israel, Bush is the least of their problems...
Yes I support Bush but DONT agree with him if he attacks Iran, unless of course they do something stupid... and they have been doing allot of stupid things of late.
2006-08-30 04:12:58 · answer #9 · answered by Dear Blabby 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush will not attack Iran & I will not support to his move if he does so.
2006-08-30 04:23:26 · answer #10 · answered by baba 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If he does it will only be as a last resort. I hope if Iran does need to be attacked that it is done by a coalition of countries united together to increase the chances of freedom winning over fundamental Islamic fascist terrorists. Don't you? It has come to my attention over the past few years starting in the 80's that it is their goal to rid the world of individual freedom and rule the world using the 6th century rantings of a lunatic named Mohammad. Nope can't do that if it's me or them it's going to be them. (I hope)
2006-08-30 04:19:43 · answer #11 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋