People are petty. They think with the primitive part of their brain. Plus most people are very uneducated when it comes to classical music and any cultural activity.
I understand where you are coming from.
2006-08-29 20:57:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jon H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I saw this question while perusing "all questions" and not under a category.
I didn't answer your classical music question because I'm not a Rachmaninov fan. I would have more of an opinion if you had asked on some of the other classical composers including Paganini. (Rachmaninov or Rachmaninoff? - I've seen it spelled both ways)
In regards to the rest of your question, I think that you may have hit the nail on the head. Based on the poor grammar and atrocious spelling one would have to conclude that most people on this site are appallingly ignorant and undereducated. What amuses me the most is that there seems to be an indirect proportion between how much these people seem to know about a subject and how certain they are their answer is correct. Have you ever seen so many people who don't seem to understand the difference between their, there and they're? or how about to, two and too?
I keep swearing I'm giving up this place as it just makes my blood pressure rise.
2006-08-29 21:18:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spiritual but not religious 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sad when you stop to think about it.
I think that's it's not so much of a stupidity issue, but that people are on here to have fun. They don't want to answer a question that is not what they are interested in. All of the younger people posting here really just don't care about music other than what they listen to. Or maybe they are uncomfortable answering something that they don't know a lot about. While I've seen plenty of "I don't know"s posted as answers, it's usually for the young askers. A real, honest, serious issue wouldn't be the best place to show your ignorance.
I hang around the forums that I feel are my strong point. Places where I think I know what I'm talking about. I avoid questions that are beyond my scope of knowledge and experience. I also avoid anything that would make me do too much serious thinking, this is one of my relax times. If I wanted to be challenged, I think I would also look for a more intellectual place other then Yahoo which is a popular place for all ages and backgrounds.
2006-08-29 21:04:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by welches_grape_jelly 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I surely have been pronounced for soliciting for prayer for individuals or perhaps pronounced once I have been given maximum suitable answer. I pronounced 2 human beings adult men because of the fact they have been very verbally abusive with my question and sexually perverted. i'm a married woman and can havenone of that. I additionally took the liberty of blockading those human beings besides. I surely have discovered decide for purely the battles to combat which you're wiling to lose. %. and choose your battles intently. No while to stand up for your self and while to back off. additionally I do supply thumbs right down to propose or sacrastic solutions, however the rfile button I purely use while the guy is blanatnly abusive and that i've got wrote my explanation why. it is a relgion and spirituality talk board the place human beings come to earnings and enhance and ask questions that they don't have the capacity to ask or experience gentle asking every physique else. there is sufficient harm, meanness and negativity interior the international devoid of including to this to the R7S talk board. specific i'm a christian. yet that would not propose I surely have the acceptable to be greater acceptable or act like i'm greater useful than every physique else. we are all noted as to love and inspire oneanother and that i remind that to my nephew and nieces while they warfare besides. human beings are reporting human beings specific yet it is purely a temeporary restoration revenge is extreme-high quality yet frogivness is even sweeter we ought to desire for those online who're destructive and reporting others because of the fact they did no longer like what they wrote. I say it is a temprary restoration because of the fact it provides a feeling of satifcation that the guy have been given back on the guy who worte the question yet would not restoration the midsection condition. Peace this grow to be a eye-catching submit thank you e4g
2016-10-01 02:05:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because you like classical music doesnt make you more intelligent than me or anyone else.
The fact that you associate interests with IQ makes you sound like an arrogant fool.
People will answer questions they have experience in, an opinion about, or an interest in.
An intelligent person would be able to figure that out on their own.
2006-08-29 21:01:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The 'classical music' question requires knowledge.
On the other hand the 'racist question'
needs some boiling feelings.
So we conclude that
more people are in touch with their feelings
than with the intellectual part of themselves.
2006-08-29 21:03:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Elena E 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, most people on this have low IQ's. They wouldn't know Classical Music if Mozart climbed out of their Asses and punched them in the nut's.
2006-08-29 21:04:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by mrharderson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're a @sshole.
I see where you are going.
Also who are you to ask people that they have an IQ lower than 70? You definitely haven't got to 70 yourself.
2006-08-29 21:02:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by lhm1968 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I didn't answer the one about Rachmaninov because I can't remember the name of the one I like best. It's great stuff, though. Best heard on vinyl. I think it's the Concerto in E Minor that I like the most.
2006-08-29 20:57:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because there are more opinions about the racist question. It is more controversial and more at the forefront of what is on peoples minds.
2006-08-29 20:57:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by katesname 2
·
0⤊
0⤋