Me neither. Funny that. Yet he said 'Saddam could stay in power' if he got rid of them, so the war was 100% because of WMD.
2006-08-29 10:15:28 · 5 answers · asked by peaco1000 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes, and.................?
2006-08-29 10:25:32 · answer #1 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The last I heard, was that congress released a report that they found 500 rounds of chemical weapons. The liberals said the shells were harmless (I guess they eat this stuff for breakfast and it affected their brains), because they were old. The Republicans said they were less than optimally potent (still dangerous, but not as dangerous as new stock) was because the people in charge of recharging them are out of power.
Both sides got the quotes they needed to bash each other in the elections ahead. Meanwhile Bush has moved on to other subjects.
2006-08-29 18:34:12 · answer #2 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well of course not the problem has been taking care of .why would he continue to beat a dead horse?Saddam is no longer in power and the weapons are still being searched for by our soldiers .he handled it the best he could Iraq is better off without that psycho.
2006-08-29 18:54:24 · answer #3 · answered by TIA 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, not my job to count his sentences.
2006-08-29 17:39:22 · answer #4 · answered by Sgt. VietnamVet 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whats your point?
2006-08-29 17:20:49 · answer #5 · answered by J' K '06 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋