It's really very simple, dumb ***. The Bible is not proof that the Bible is true, any more than The Hobbit is proof that The Hobbit is true.
The people you are referring to don't believe in the Bible. Furthermore, Mary is not thought to be much older... between 12 and 15 when she had Jesus. Your God, then, is likewise a pedophile. In fact, by your logic, a whole lot of men were pedophiles then, as this was a common age range to be married.
You are a dangerous, sad little liar. How dare you even think about calling people liars for having beliefs different from your own.
Wanna talk about pedophiles? Here's what you wrote to a 13 year old girl...
"another girl on our blog thinks she is a hotter princess than u r-but i dont tickle her-she is kinda stuck up and too whatever for me-but guys adore her-not me i like u alot
posted 31 minutes ago"
"david … Tickle
ok babe what would u like to talk about-the weather changes-if i kiss u -u will change and adore me for life-but Jesus never changes-life is fun-pay the bills and have the thrills-but know the drills-peace up and u been tickled properly lol awww u r so cutie"
http://360.yahoo.com/profile-FMZWz.U8dLNyxk9SEAW71rxHmSV6
2006-08-29 10:12:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Snark 7
·
8⤊
1⤋
you are a jew? why not make a call to your jewish brothers to accept christ into their hearts?
You must realy think they are stupid. They beleive everything in the bible, right up until the part were Jesus starts saying they aren't the choosen people.
People are going to beleive what they want to, and no misspelled barely understandable lecture, i'm sorry question, is going to change anything.
By the way don't judge Muhamed for sleeping with a 9 year old, he was just setting an example for all the christian preists to follow, except they must have misunderstood because they like young boys.
and by the way, jesus lineage in the bible refers to joseph, true but not how you think. the name that they have as father of joseph, is actually Mary's father meaning that it did show mary's lineage, it showed joseph because he was a male. If you want to bash the bible thats fine, but at least know what you are talking about.
2006-08-29 17:36:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by therealmikebrown 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
First off have you ever heard of bunny trails? Cuz you have alot of them goin on in your question. Secondly yes Jesus is the son of God however, at the same time he is not. He is part of the trinity or the "God Head" the trinity has three God Heads. The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit. All of which are God.
2006-08-29 17:16:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Krazykitty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um - duh - hello - not everyone believes that the Bible is the absolute truth that people who believe in Jesus claim it to be.
It is wonderful you claim to have accepted Jesus into your heart - but since you are unable to show the love Jesus has for you to anyone else- you still have a lot of work to do. Your disrespect to others is proof that your being 'saved' has not fully taken affect and that you have not been reborn by the Holy Spirit with a new heart. Look back at the Bible and see the truth before you go shouting at others what to believe.
2006-08-29 17:17:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Unity 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
1) Not everyone believes in your God. And part of a Muslim's belief is that Jesus was a prophet, but not the son of God. Different religion different beliefs. I think Christianity is crap, but that's my own opinion. I'm not going to force that on anyone.
2) I'm sure one of your ancestors was a pedophile in terms of our standard now. It was common practice for girls to be married off at the onset of puberty--especially over 1000 years ago. Does that make your ancestor a pedophile? Not necessarily. A woman's purpose in many cultures was to give their husband sons. They were property, and they often died in childbirth. You fail to look back in time at the context of that time period--which was drastically different than now!!
2006-08-29 17:16:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
David,
When I see your "questions" I wonder why lies, arrogance, deception, and cowardly propagandists exist.
=======================
David,
You are a Christian. Stop this evil and deceptive form of missionizing. It degrades Christianity.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApnC4dngKeRuGKyqQldbLd_zy6IX?qid=20060723102937AA4N2eb
. It is, by definition, impossible for it to be "jewish" to believe in jesus. "Jewish" is, by defintion, what jews have historically and contemporarily believe. Since in neither scenario do we find "believing in jesus", then we must clearly realize that belief in jesus is not something "jewish". You can call it "biblical" (and still be wrong), but certainly not "jewish".
. On the side, the subject of Isaiah 53 is promised a "long life" and "seed" (i.e. physical children). Clearly this isn't about jesus.
=======================================================
Sources:
http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/jewishsociety/Why_Jews_Dont_Believe_In_Jesus.asp
http://jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/general_messiah-criteria02.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_messiah#Textual_requirements
=======================================================
oh, and lastly, I've decided that you truly epitomize everything I find intensely intellectually unsatisfying about christianity. (And you clearly do not understand hebrew.)
2006-08-29 17:56:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You did not quote "Jesue." You quoted various authors of the books contained in the New Testament, who may have been taking liberites with the truth to sell their cult to a Roman audience.
In the Roman Empire, their gods were divine, or at least children of the gods. To keep thier cult viable, they would have needed to establish Jesus as a son of God, as well as possibly create the resurrection to support the divinity of "Jesus."
Clearly, the opening lines of Matthew show the lineage of Jesus, From Abraham, through fourteen generations to David, through fourteen generations to Jechonias, through fourteen generations to Joseph. The lineage is carefully traced to Joseph, not to Mary. This is because the original intent of the authors was to present "Jesus" as a messiah, but not as the son of god, but as the true heir to the throne of David.
2006-08-29 17:24:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jim T 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Wasn't it the Jews who wanted Jesus crucified?
Dork.
2006-08-29 17:17:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by twowords 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
OK, Hello-David-Israel-Moron,
Islamic Muslims don't follow your bible
you can't prove the existence of a "Jesus" or "Christ" like figure historically, like the proof existing in museums of Pharaohs, Caesars, Chinese Emperors, etc...
even the much quoted historian Josephus wrote of nineteen people referred to as Jesus, and not one of them was from Nazareth, 1955/68 excavation determined that 6BC - 30AD Nazareth was a grave yard, religious people of Jewish faith do not live near or inside burial grounds (Mishnah, Bab, Bathra 2.9)
the statement Dah Hello? makes you appear even more idiotic
2006-08-29 17:52:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Voodoo Doll 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Thump thump thump. Just because you believe doesn't mean everyone else has too. Jesus didn't do anything for me nor did anyone else other than the people who have helped me in my life and most of them weren't even Christians.
2006-08-29 17:18:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by worldneverchanges 7
·
3⤊
1⤋