English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

george bush makes me feel like i could be president that's how poor of a president it think he is and im sorry for those of you who disagree but you have to understand that he has had alot of people killed and you better belive that when there is a draft that lots of more people are going to die! and what kind of english talking person can't say terror

2006-08-29 09:52:47 · 51 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

51 answers

strictly speaking legally he can not be impeached. if you don't like his policies, you raise your voice in democratic means.

2006-09-04 19:05:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 13 0

I SWEAR TO GOD...NONE OF YOU HAVE A CLUE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING!!! Just because you don't like President Bush doesn't mean he is a crappy president. He has not broken any laws and has most definitely not comitted any offenses that are worthy of impeachment. Show a little respect for the leader of your country. If anything we should be angry with Clinton for allowing security in the US to go so lax that the conditions were right for 9-11 when president Bush arrived in the white house. I did not like Clinton but I still respected him while he was in office and any self-respecting American would respect the leader of their country no matter who it is! By the way I'm sure that most of the individuals replying to this question didn't even vote in the last election.

2006-09-05 09:23:02 · answer #2 · answered by Bridget Marie 2 · 0 0

YES, for the following charges:

1. Genocide
2. Illegal occupation of a foreign country
3. Unnecessary use of force
4. Purgery (no weapons of mass destruction have yet to be found)
5. Draft dodger
6. Continual participation in business transactions with the Bin Laden family
7. Knowingly allowing the events of 9/11 to unfold
8. Spying on the "American" public without Supreme Court authorization
.....Need I say more?

Watch the video from the link below

2006-09-05 12:01:05 · answer #3 · answered by Phenom 2 · 0 0

You need to learn what it takes to impeached. Now on to your misunderstanding...you do realize all those people who "Bush is killing" went on their own free will. Each of them joined the military and many of them joined after 9/11 to go fight terrorist. Do you even like in the USA? And why does everyone keep bringing up a draft? Who said anything about a draft? If it is needed, the whole world is in trouble!

2006-09-02 10:42:26 · answer #4 · answered by fin 3 · 2 0

No he should not be impeached. For what reason?

If you think he's a poor president, then that's just too bad for you. That's not an impeachable offence.

By the way there is a draft. All males have to register at age 18. They have not called for the use of drafted soldiers and I hope they don't have to.

Shame on you for wanting people to die just so you can bad mouth the president. You and people like you want to predict doom and gloom and blame it on the president.

2006-08-29 10:15:15 · answer #5 · answered by RealityCheck 2 · 1 2

Wake up Bob. How many people died because Clinton did nothing. From the first World Trade Center bombing through 9/11 (which wouldn't have happened if he had acted like a President), there were more dead than two or three Iraqs.
Wake up... it's war, and we must win.

2006-09-05 13:07:17 · answer #6 · answered by cmd3982 3 · 0 0

You all do realize that the President of the United States does not cause all the problems in the world??? RIGHT?????

His is just stuck with being blamed for it.

All wars kill people. You all do know that don't you??????

WW II killed approx. 500,000 Americans & Hitler started that. And we were only in WW II for 4 years after the bombing of Pearl Harbor in Hawaii by the Japanese.. The war actually started in about 1938 and millions of people in Europe died , long before we were pulled into it.

Viet Nam (Not a declared war and we did cut and run there) Killed approx. 54,000.

THE DAY WE CAN PROTECT OUR FREEDOMS WITHOUT PEOPLE DYING. WE ABSOLUTELY WILL.

2006-09-05 03:12:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

first of all i would like to say yes i think bush should be impeached. and second to all of those people who sit there and say bush shouldnt be impeached but clinton should? you need to get your facts straight. clinton did not get anyone killed by getting head. bush on the other hand has gotten tens of thousands of people killed. all of which could have been avoided, but because his daddy had beef he thinks he has beef. clinton was a great president and anyone who believes that bush is a better president needs to strap on a uniform and go over seas, and then come on here and tell me hes a good president.

2006-08-29 10:11:21 · answer #8 · answered by Renay 1 · 1 1

You, who don't really know him, are making judgments that those who have daily contact with him see the opposite view.

Bush has done nothing that warrants impeachment. Try to remember that Bush may think that you are a poor citizen and he may wish he had better people to lead.

2006-09-03 02:02:16 · answer #9 · answered by Mr.Been there 3 · 2 0

They both lied, but Clinton never got anyone killed and was impeached. Why shouldn't Bush be. Look at the lies and half truths that the american people have been told. Weapons of Mass Destruction? Sure they are there, we just can't see them.

2006-08-29 10:11:02 · answer #10 · answered by gdm 1 · 1 1

Many conservative apologists argue that he shouldn’t be impeached because he has not broken the law. Granted there maybe no legal stipulation that he broke when he mislead the country into going to war, under the pretext of fighting terrorists, when the country we were attacking was not behind the 9/11 terrorist plot. Unfortunately, to my knowledge neither incompetence, nor mendacity is legal grounds for impeachment. So on technical aspects we cannot impeach him now.

However, I think one good thing will come out of his continued presence in the oval office. He makes the Republicans, and those with warmongering aspirations, look more absurd and moral bankrupt every day that he holds the title as President. He represents them in such a negative light. The long-term result of this will be that people will have a disdain for Presidential candidates who are quick to fight wars. This reticence to accept pro-war presidents, will spell the death sentence for many conservatives, for whom militaristic aggression, is their main selling point.

2006-08-29 10:07:31 · answer #11 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers