I agree with previous posts - no. Sounds to me like an unnecessary back-formation from 'continuation'. A parallel example which became acceptable usage generations ago is 'to orientate' from 'orientation'. The original verb was 'to orient'.
orient -> orienation : orientation<- orientate
continue -> continuation : continuation <- continuate
2006-08-29 09:44:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by palaver 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not in the dictionaries/dictionary functions I have just checked. But it is used on websites. A goggle search brings up some technical usage.
It looks like a bastardization from the tech/US world.
Are you in US?
2006-08-29 09:11:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't think so... But it might be an old word that they don't have in the modern dictionaries. But why they would use it is beyond me...
2006-08-29 09:42:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. It is a word. Also "shub" is a word. Just because they mean nothing doesn't imply they are not words. They are meaningless words.
2006-08-29 10:04:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes, you are right. there is no such word as continuated. it's probably his version of a past tense for continual !!
continual, continuance, continuant, continuation, continuative, continuator.
continue, continuing, continuity, continuous, continuum, continued.
2006-08-29 09:14:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by babytalk 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
"Continued" will do just fine.
2006-08-29 09:13:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by x 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No
2006-08-29 09:11:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by JW 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
no
2006-08-29 09:10:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by 1993 FLSTF 4
·
1⤊
0⤋