No body blames him for Katrina, just the cavalier way he handled it. Many of the dissent and divisiveness in this country is due to his keeping the pot stirred in an effort to keep people distracted and at each others throats while he and his Administration destroy our standing and respect in the world. And that he uses terrorist fears to usurp our freedoms and violate International Law.
No it's not all his fault, he is a willing tool of Cheney, Rove, Rumsfield and all who have enriched themselves through chicanery and manipulation, murder and the lives of 2,600 and counting young Americans .
2006-08-29 05:44:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
While not everything is his fault there sure is a lot of serious screw ups that are. Response to hurricane Katrina was his sorry fault and it's sorry slow progress is his fault. The Iraq war is his fault apparently Afghanistan wasn't good enough for him so lets invade Iraq.Dumbing down environmental laws are his fault. dumbing down our freedoms for the illusion of security are his fault. Driving up the deficit to new highs are his fault. Packing govt agencies with incompetent cronies are his fault. Get the picture this dumb *** is by far the worst piece of trash ever to be president of this country!
2006-08-31 08:44:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by brian L 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
a million. a number of his methods, alongside with repeat a huge lie often sufficient and finally human beings will have self belief it, are precisely like Hitler's. additionally the area approximately protecting the folk afraid because of the fact then it is far less perplexing to administration them. 2. He did no longer lead, he sucked up and reassured us and then did exceedingly lots each and everything incorrect. We did no longer want somebody to pat us on the top and let us know there there little woman each and everything would be ok...we wanted somebody to seize the undesirable adult men and fairly he enable our undesirable guy circulate and went after Saddam. 3. genuine he would not administration gas expenses yet are you advantageous his kin has no hobbies in extreme gas expenses given their close corporation and private relationship with Saudi royal kin? 4. No bunky I never believed it, i ought to recognize a liar once I observed one. I recommended congress to no longer authorize invasion because of the fact Bush ought to no longer be depended directly to exhaust all different innovations first. do no longer EVER tell me that i presumed that little liar. 5. Saddam stored the non secular fundamentalists out of Iraq in spite of the certainty that for the duration of an extremely brutal way. Taliban's capacity is resurgent, binLaden's capacity is starting to be alongside the Afghanistan/Pakistan border and he has greater followers now than in simple terms before Sept. 11. So no, i do unlike President Bush. in case you lived interior the genuine international neither might you. and that i for one am smarter than he's, and far greater ethical.
2016-10-01 01:19:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ridder 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is merely a pawn- he is an elected public figure who deals in public relations- we all should no how many other people control every move he has to make. It is his job to publicly announce decisions and that makes him the fall guy even though his advisors and cabinet members and the senate and the house and many many others you and I will never even know about are really the ones to blame. To sum it up you should not blame him personally but blame his whole administration and what they have decided for all of us.
2006-08-29 05:29:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Some of it may be his fault but not all of it.Bush has done a good job in some respects..But alot of problems began in the Clinton administration.We the people still have the right to vote and can change this mess.
2006-08-29 06:49:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by John G 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't...Does anyone think that things would be better if Al Gore was president? Think not. Bill Clinton and his administration is a big part of what is wrong with our nation. How could we elect such a moron? Bush is not the worst president ever. Cliton was. Blame him.
2006-08-29 06:37:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Not the one for you! 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
it's all because of Bush. George Bush say that he's fighting a war against terrorism, it's not, George Bush has started this war to make money. That's correct. After all, WAR MAKES JOB AND MONEY. Lets start from the beginning, the reason behind fighting in Afghanistan, terroism was just a minor issue for fighting in Afghanistan at the time but the major issue that dragged Bush into a poverty struck state called Afghanistan was that Afghanistan is number 1 producer of Poppy in the whole world and Poppy is a type of drug and America is number 1 buyer of Poppy from Afghanistan and America is country in the world where drugs are consumed at the highest rate possible. But before war with Afghanistan, it was very expensive for America to buy Poppy from Afghanistan because after all, America buys so much Poppy from Afghanistan so Afghan people had raised the price of Poppy to America so by attacking Afghanistan, Bush got the control over Afghanistan and now getting Poppy from there is easy and at a cheap price. Now, lets move on to the next point, War in Iraq, the only reason for it all of us know it and it is that that Bush attacked Iraq is because OIL. It's oil that has Bush's attention. And do you want to know more on terrorism. If George Bush is worried so much about terrorism then why don't he pays much special attention toward the Irani people, Iran which are close enough on their work to develop Nuclear weapons and North Korea. And do you want to know any further more about that what countries are supporting terrorists, it's Pakistan. I am myself from India. The govt. of my country have always found the evidence to prove that Pakistan is supporting terrorists by taking the satellite photographs of the parts of Pakistan that have terrorist camps in there and American govt. too posess some of those photographs also. Yes that's what they are doing in Pakistan creating terrorists out of normal people and send some of them in other parts of world to fight and send some of them Kashmir. If there's so much care about terrorism teh I welcome Bush to come and visit Kashmir because the Indian army often kills lots of terrirists in there and catches some of them too. I once saw a interview on television with a terrorist who was telling that how did they trained him to become a terrorist, he was saying that first they won't let him even know the way from his house to the terrorist camp, what they did to him was tie his eyes with a black fabric so he couldn't see anything and then put him in a truck and then get him to the camp and there the people who trained him to become one and go into Kashmir were officials of the Pakistani army or the police. But what interest could be in Pakistan for George Bush to pay his attention there. Most of the northern Pakistan's most regions have terrorist camps established in there. And these maybe the reasons that the people of other countries do not like America or it's people a lot.
2006-08-29 06:06:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
I have the same question--the liberals (with their neocon term) say Bush is responsible for everything wrong w/ THE WORLD!!! pretty much. not all liberals, but some think he was responsible for 9/11--THAT"S CRAZY--the islamic extremists are the people who were responsible for 9/11 yeah, some of them say it was his fault for katrina and im sure the upcoming ernesto these r the same people who say the lunar landing never happened and the holocaust never happened THEY ARE CRAZY!!!!! haha--anyways, the fighting between the shiites and the sunais has been going on for thousands of years, the names have just changed--bush is not responsible for the freakshow radical muslims who throw parades for their son who just blew himself up and took a number of innocent lives w/ him, oppress women, and follow the qu'ran (koran) that has bold-faced evidence to kill all infidels (there are good muslims--but they aren't standing up and talking down to the radicalists)
2006-08-29 05:31:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
HELLO! "Leader of the free world" He makes the call. He made the call to go to Iraq when we we're not finish getting Osama. He made the calls that make America have less influence in the world. What ever happend to the saying "The Buck Stops Here". When you become leader you take responsibility. It's his watch. I can go on but it's no use arguing with an idiot .
2006-08-29 06:07:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by rk 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. He is in charge. He makes decisions that affect everyone in the world. So far he has made lousy decisions. While the Hurricanes are not his fault, how he responds to them is.
2006-08-29 05:35:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by courage 6
·
0⤊
1⤋