Could you lova a man and live with him and be faithful to him if he was unable to have sexual intercourse?
2006-08-29 04:16:54 · 48 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Let's be real here for a sec...Relationship is built on respect, communication, honesty, love and sex. Take out the sex and what you got is a friendship.
So if you want do you be sexless friends? If thats a yes, buy yourself some really good batteries & let the buzzing begin.
2006-08-29 04:41:08 · answer #1 · answered by wowcanusayit 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if I could "LOVA" a man who for what ever reason was unable to have sexual intercourse. But I could LOVE a man who was unable to have sexual intercourse, live with him and absolutely be faithful-- " if" after knowing him as a person I loved him. Have to know the person first. Underneath each exterior lies a real person and if that person was someone I liked first then , yes I definitely could love him and be faithful.
2006-08-29 04:25:06 · answer #2 · answered by Brains & Beauty 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love comes from the heart not the male/female organs. Just because a man is unable to have sexual intercourse doesn't mean that can't love him. There are other ways to pleasure each other.
2006-08-29 04:25:46 · answer #3 · answered by gemone523 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um yup. Dry spells are pretty common in every relationship, I've learned to take care of myself during them. I love my husband enough to value his companionship and personality. Besides, there may be other things he can do that are physically fulfilling. But even if he was paralyzed, I would stand by him and loyally care for him. There's more to life than sex.
(Now this is in a relationship where the partner PHYSICALLY can't give sex. If two people are perfectly healthy, and one decides not to... this is a problem. One that needs to be resolved. If it's within a person's ability to, they absolutely should. (Must!) But if it is NOT within a person's ability, due to outside circumstances, then love should triumph.)
2006-08-29 04:22:05 · answer #4 · answered by UnrealJuju 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
most of the girls say yes to the question, because they just think that love counts. and IT DOES. but if you look over it logically. most of women turn it down after a while, because life is not all love. there are other things that matters for a woman ( like children & pleasure). only rare women can have such a powerful love to live with such a man.
2006-08-29 04:35:42 · answer #5 · answered by Sally 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-08-29 04:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by Kelley K. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. A relationship great relationship shouldn't be based on sex. Even if my bf couldn't have intercourse, I would still be with him and willing to marry him. We enjoy being together. Also, just because you can't have intercourse doesn't mean that you can't do other things.
2006-08-29 04:26:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats a hard question to answer maybe if I was in love with him before the point where we couldn't have sex but just meeting someone and knowing that I will never be able to share sex with him I don't think so sex is too important in a relationship
2006-08-29 04:20:19 · answer #8 · answered by tpchick22 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes of course!! You don't have to have sex just to be in a good relationship!! If your spouce thinks other wise she didn't love you in the first place!! theres more exciting things to do besides clinging to the bed or your spouce lol just do fun stuff you can still be cute and keep the relationship without sex!!!
2006-08-29 04:22:45 · answer #9 · answered by Shaila F 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Sex should not be of importance when you are spending the rest of your life with someone who loves you unconditionally and is able to provide for your every need. Then you could appreciate him for what he can provide and not having sex influence the relationship. Plus you can always buy some toy and he could always use his tongue and fingers.
2006-08-29 04:21:52 · answer #10 · answered by luvlynspecial 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋