A steamer is better for cooking veg and fish..............a pressure cooker is better for stews and stuff
2006-08-29 03:29:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by tinkerbell 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A steamer just steams the food, a pressure cooker cooks under pressure. For fish or vegetables you just need a steamer. A pressure cooker cooks food faster because it is under pressure. You can do an hours worth of cooking in ten minutes, but it would be overkill for fish and vegetables which cook quickly anyway.
2006-08-29 03:32:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by irongrama 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A pressure cooker is not the best thing to use when cooking fish, as the pressure may cause it to simply break apart, though it does do well for vegetables, a steamer would be better, however, because it does not cook with so much heat....boiling vegetables takes many of the nutrients out of them, while steaming does affect the nutrient quantity quite as much, i believe...the most healthy way to eat many vegetables is washed, and raw. but i would recommend a steamer, it would make much better quality dishes with fish and veggies
2006-08-29 03:33:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by dalilvr333 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm pretty sure that you want a steamer - my mum used to have apressure cooker and it seems like a lot more hassle than a steamer. As i understand it, the healthiest way to cook your fish and vegeables is to steam it as this keep all the nutrients and good stuff in the food.
With a steamer you just prepare the veg, pour in hot water to the bottom section od the steamer, stach the trays and switch it on for the appropriate amount of time (some makes give you a book with the steamer telling you what takes what amount of time).
Good luck!
2006-08-29 03:33:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
A steamer is powerful for cooking issues inclusive of vegetables and fish and a few hen dishes. a lot of human beings think of that steamers are greater greater healthy as they do no longer enable the nutrition interior the nutrition to leach out into the cooking water. some issues do prepare dinner quicker in a steamer however the thicker, greater dense ingredients take slightly longer because it takes a whilst for the steam to penetrate the nutrition - like potatoes etc. A tension cooker chefs issues like soups and curries and stews rather rather nicely. The are super for cooking issues like beans and pulses as their cooking situations are very much decreased. I even have the two and could say that for cheapness it may be greater efficient to choose for a steamer and see in case you get on with that. The bamboo ones from cookshops are low fee (a pair of fiver) and in super condition over a pan of boiling water. A tension cooker is greater high priced and take greater beneficial maintainence - you will get them 2nd hand yet beware to ensure the seals are ok.
2016-12-11 17:14:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A pressure cooker is much better in my opinion because it is much more versatile and in addition it cooks very fast. Also, don't worry about it blowing up. All modern cookers have plenty of safety devices on them and once you learn the art of pressure cooking you will wonder how you ever got along without it. They cost anywhere from $40. to $250. for the top of the line high capacity models. Just make sure you get stainless steel and not an aluminum cooker.
2006-08-29 09:16:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by COACH 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Steamer... it keeps more of the nutrients in the food...
Pressure cooker is pretty much the same as boiling in water, the water absorbs many of the nutrients and is then poured away... The pressure cooker cooks faster than open boiling because water boils at a higher temperature under pressure so when the water is hotter, the food cooks faster....
2006-08-29 03:34:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Andy FF1,2,CrTr,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They both steam the food, but a pressure cooker is faster. I'd definitely go with a steamer though, partly because there are sme safety issues with pressure cookers (exploding, and also burns) but also because they cook so fast things are often over-done, which is not the way you want to eat your fish or veggies!
2006-08-29 03:32:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Maddy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Steamer for basic cooking. Pressure cooker if you are planning on doing any canning.
2006-08-29 03:34:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a steamer is best . A pressure cooker cooks faster but loses some of the nutrients.
2006-08-29 03:30:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by johnny28 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Use the steamer for fish and veggies. If you're not familiar with a pressure cooker, you'll end up with mushy veggies. Might even blow the lid off and have to scrape fish off the ceiling if you're not careful.
2006-08-29 03:31:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by spindoccc 4
·
0⤊
0⤋