I think Carlos Mencia is funny =0p...
If you're one of the people that he's making fun of, then I can see why you'd like to deport him. Are you a Dee Dee Dee? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5ss-5zcGM&mode=related&search=
The tune is very catchy, don't ya think!?!
2006-08-29 01:46:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by r0bErT4u 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he's funny as hell...and he'll give you some good food for thought on the immigration issue, too. A little comedy doesn't hurt, u know? I think he sides with people trying to enter the country illegally, though, and I don't think that's right. At the same time, though, for any change to happen to affect this whole situation, debate helps, he's brazen enough to step to the mic and speak out.
The reason that this whole thing is even an issue is because people have sat on their hands for years, unwilling/unable/unclear on what to do or how to go about making some real decisions on this, hence the chronic porosity and misunderstanding/misperceptions about our borders and immigration laws. A law with no real enforcement amounts to no law at all, if the speed limit says 60 and there's no cops, the speed limit is essentially infinite, unless the other drivers on the road speak up in protest at you zooming by at a buck-thirty. And, it's a similar situation with illegal immigration, the citizens are speaking up, and kind of forcing the politicians to take notice of their displeasure with this entire situation.
One of the direct negatives related to illegal immigration is the potentially infinite expansion of our future collective tax obligations as citizens. Whereas for the most part, we follow with the concept of personal responsibility and not having more kids, for example, than you yourself can support, in Mexico where the illegal aliens are largely from the church has been steadily preaching 'go forth and multiply'. Unfortunately, it's been getting more and more difficult to try and assimilate everyone, and it's getting time to put the issue of illegal immigration up to a public vote, an outcome that some of our politiicans are apparently trying to studiously avoid, as it would a) take the decision-making power out of their hands and return it to the citizens, and b) probably precede other change-inducing public votes that would likely result in some of them losing their jobs. Just such a vote happens to be coming up in November, and as more cities and municipalities act independently and enact and start to enforce common-sense anti-illegal immigraiton ordinances and measures, Congress will increasingly be 'on the spot' for having missed the boat on this one. My perception/belief is that there's a majority of american citizens who do not want to see mass illegal immigration, who believe that the borders should be enforced to prevent it, and that instead of acknowledging and tending to their responsibilities, Congress et. al. have instead been pursuing policies that are unrealistic and unfit in our current day and age. There's 6.6 billion people in the world, now, barely 100 years after the 1 billion mark there's now 5 billion more, if the global population growth rate continues at this exponential rate, we will have a Problem of severe magnitude, as even the best estimates only allocate enough resources to provide for 2/3 that many. When you have a lot of people, and a limited amount of resources, frictions are inevitable. The illegal immigration debate, to my mind, is just an appetizer of what could realistically transpire in the future, and already has in some countries where resources are much tighter than in the US. How much fuel do you think 9 billion people can use per day? Corn, sugar, wheat, fresh water? Illegal immigration is only part of the global population growth picture, it bears consideration and is grounds for clear-eyed, sober planning for the future rather than simple liberal tolerance. People without means will do practically anything to get the things that they want....and I don't know how they plan to keep law and order with that kind of economic pressure...suffice it to say the door's wide open for catastrophic outcomes unless we rethink the whole immigration issue...
2006-08-29 12:10:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by gokart121 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
heres a tip , if you dont like his show , then dont watch it , turn the tv to another channel or go outside. if you dont like him then thats great but other people do. and as you say , he is a citizen , which means if you deport him youll only take him back to his native country , so hed be back in like....los angeles or something which wouldnt solve anything at all , neither would deporting him.
2006-08-29 08:26:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by to whom it may confide 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he's brave, innovative, edgy and funny. As far as deporting someone because you just don't like them....don't think so.
Try changing the channel instead.
2006-08-29 08:43:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that would b an illegal action, to deport sum1 that is a citizen, and then u whine, "why do illegals brake the laws" wa wa wa. think man b realistic, why would u ask sumthing like that
2006-08-29 08:32:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by el_oso_candeloso 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Trust me if we could deport celebrities on account of them not
having talent, there will be at least one big boat load.
2006-08-29 08:25:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by retrodragonfly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm ... force fed Mencia ... change the channel.
2006-08-29 08:34:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I think he's funny.
And seeing as you want to deport citizens, how about we deport you.
2006-08-29 08:24:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shockey Monkey 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're the retard. Why are you watching a show that you dislike? Just don't watch his show and he will fade away.
2006-08-29 08:25:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sarah 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I wish they would..He isn't funny.
Dave Chapelle come back!
2006-08-29 09:00:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ckarri` 2
·
0⤊
0⤋