English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Personally, I believe George W Bush is living on borrowed time. I think the Bush legacy will end in a public hanging as there is more than enough evidence right now, and more is coming all the time, to prove he was at the very least, a part of the 9/11psychological attack on America. His war crimes as a result of that fiasco will surely net him much more than Impeachment.

What do you think?

Watch this video. It is better than Loose Change in terms of delivering verifiable fact.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6529813972926262623

I know it is comical to place this question in the "Law Enforcement" category as the Law is NOT doing it's job right now. If it were, Bush would be behind bars, right now.

2006-08-28 23:32:24 · 8 answers · asked by InternetPosterChild 2 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

The only reason people who speak out against GWB are not imprisoned is because there are not enough jail cells to imprison 85% of the country/world.

2006-08-29 02:33:31 · update #1

8 answers

Well, I reckon he is an asshole. But before his term is up..i see another great and more horrific attack, in which he will declare martial law and you can say goodbye to 2008.

I don't believe this man will leave quietly.

2006-08-28 23:39:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Just because you do not like President George W. Bush does not mean he is a tyrant.

One of the least attractive traits of many so called "enlightened" persons is that when they run out of logic, they resort to name calling.

President Bush will leave office on January 20, 2009. That date cannot and will not be extended. That is a fact.

Can you name one "tyrant" that has term limits?

By definition, they are around until death or forcibly removed from office. Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Castro, Amin, Assad, Khomeini.

Those were and are real tyrants.

Good luck proving that President Bush played a role in the 9-11 attacks. Your fellow detractors insist that he is mentally deficient.

How is it that he could "steal" an election, coordinat the simultaneous hijacking of four airliners and (depending on the theory) either have them flown into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and an open field in Pennsylvania OR have the planes flown to secret Naval bases where the passengers and crew were killed or sent to concentration camps and missiles fired into the Pentagon and cargo aircraft flown into the World Trade Center and do all of this in less than a year?

If he is smart enough and evil enough to do that, how is it that you are still alive to ask your question?

Or if he is just a figurehead front man for Karl Rove, where is Rove's next George Bush? And once again, how is it that you are still alive to ask your question?

By the way, could you expand on your statement that "the Law is NOT doing it's job right now."? What is the "Law" failing to do?

I would like to see something more specifc than a general statement about the law failing to satisfy your invective.

2006-08-29 09:20:23 · answer #2 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 0 0

Check 3/4 of African leaders on your list.
also Check North Korea, Iran, lybia and a few more
It is true that the biggest tyrant is the leader of the "land of freedom" But unfortunately the patriot act has allowed him to classify a large part of his records beyond disclosure. I believe that they are smart enough to have no direct evidence against them(why else is Osama there). I believe that via a few mediums he is operating in order of the CIA. Think about it
He always shows up when it is very convenient for GW Bush.
e.g. Just before the last elections Osama conveniently showed up threatening the US immediatly Bush points shot up.
it's a hypochrit bunch of sods but unfortunately you're stuck with them.

2006-08-29 06:44:08 · answer #3 · answered by peter gunn 7 · 0 0

Isn't the ? about "tyrrants"? George Bush is not a tyrrant. What "psychological" attack? 9-11 was real.....and George Bush didn't cause those airplanes to fly into the Twin Towers. Bin Ladin has "been hidin" . If he is a "tyrrant", it is only amongst his own kind. Why can't he show his face, and be a man? Bush should invite Bin Ladin out to his ranch for a "hunt" with our vice-president!

2006-08-29 06:53:14 · answer #4 · answered by Scorpius59 7 · 0 0

For tyrants, look to Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong Ill, Hugo Chavez, Ahmadinejad, the Taliban, to name a few. People who express criticism of these people are quickly arrested and imprisoned. Torture and murder characterize the treatment of political prisoners in these regimes; they are the rule. We are a country of laws and our constitution protects our freedoms. We can only hope the judiciary does not undo it too soon. If you believe all that conspiracy stuff, your reality check has bounced.

2006-08-29 07:08:08 · answer #5 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 0 0

The imperial presidency is clearly a Constitutional abuse, and certainly it aspires to the condition of dictatorship--but I think the wind is blowing from the other direction now.

I do not believe he will ever be punished, but he will be held accountable, at least by history.

2006-08-29 06:43:42 · answer #6 · answered by snowbaal 5 · 0 0

Tyrants, dictators, "life time presidents" they all exist, even prosper today, but don't mix GWB with those, at least not before you try living under such tyrant, and learn the difference from personal experience.

2006-08-29 06:42:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mugabe in Zimbabwe is a tyrant, Bush isn't.

2006-08-29 06:46:10 · answer #8 · answered by XT rider 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers