English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After fullfillment of al needs essental need for human survival like air, water, meal & shelter, only most important need is SEX but why its talking, discussion, sharing is considered as SIN or TABOO. Why society does not accept it as natural inherent requirement of body. Why concept of moral ethics are attached with it ? Whreas Sex is the only act which gives relief in moments of unbearable pain & agony.

2006-08-28 21:16:49 · 16 answers · asked by vijay k 1 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

16 answers

first off, different people have different standards. Whereas some might consider it a subject of taboo, i certainly do not.
moral ethics come in because another's needs are taken into concern during sex (or should be anyways). You dont "need" to think about another person when you eat, breathe, drink...etc. But with sex it's not just about you!(i hope this isn't news to you) You have to think about another's needs, conerns and mentality. I understand "sex is the only act which gives [you] relief", but does he/she want to have sex as well? if so how? when? why? that's where your morals should kick in. if he/she doesn't want to but you need to 'get your relief' then that's forcing it - what we call rape. that's definitely an issue. a serious one too at that. So dont be all acting like sex is not a hyped up deal because it is! Think hard and well before you do it. Use your head (and not just the one down there)

2006-08-29 04:21:41 · answer #1 · answered by Missy chandrasekar 2 · 0 0

I think it is something more than so called moral ethics etc.

It is the urge and requirements of having sex which can be caused by a number of reasons, mainly:

1) You are young, not married and want to have fun,
2) You are married but are not satisfied within your married life due to sex or other matters, or
3) Your requirements of sex are more than what normal people feel.

You are right, when you say society must accept that it is the natural requirement, however, when you live in a society you have to follow the rules that the society has adopted.

Or else, everybody will make their own rules and want others to follow them.

Like for example, society accepts it is a natural thing to happen, so everybody is free to have sex with anyone.

Now someone happens to like to have sex with your wife / husband / mother / father / sister / brother etc.

Do you feel satisfied with that kind of arrangement? I am sure most of the people won’t.

So which one is better?

I think people need to know what they require and how much they require and how that can be fulfilled instead of taking shelter under moral ethics etc.

2006-08-29 04:38:41 · answer #2 · answered by GS 3 · 0 0

Moral ethics are related to every action done. Since sex is an activity it is also covered. f**king is not the only part of sex. even helping your life partner to eat, bath, excrete(cleaning) when they are unable to help themselves(due to old age or accident) is a part of sex. Sex covers a broader spectrum than most of us think. Its not just physical but also mental and spiritual. To put in correct words, f***ing your life partner is termed in the classical way as LOVE MAKING. That explains.
Moral ethics deal with problems and issues that stress the mind while dealing with. Since sex has more of psychology and spirituality than physical pleasure, ethics broadly address it. Talking about sex is considered as a bad act because of three reasons
1. To stress that it is not just physical issue and that it be given its due respect considering the wonders it covers
2. Most people do not know what has to be spoken where, why and how. The amateur ones should not be misguided by foolish deed of elders.
3. Since sex covers a lot of physical pleasure though it is mainly psychological and spiritual(it is) and its known that all humans make mistakes, even learned may addressed it in a wrong way(high probability).
In case a person can cover the topic in the correct sense and format, provided all those in the discussion can comprehend, it is not a mistake to talk about it.
Its a pleasure in life and is not essential to live.
The monk named Mihalao Tolutuous never saw a woman in lifetime.

2006-08-29 07:51:20 · answer #3 · answered by PP 2 · 0 0

Among all the basic needs of human kind, SEX have the greatest force and most enjoyable. If we permitted to stick to it only, then we won't do any other damn thing. Again, this have lots of after act consequences. Normally most of us not ready to accept those before the act. Thats why a taboo is always there.
Another aspect is that the ultimate goal in SEX is reproduction. If no taboo is there, just think of a society with unlimited end products.

2006-08-29 04:42:42 · answer #4 · answered by Dipak B 2 · 0 0

Sexual desire is just that, desire. We will not die if we don't have sex unlike food water and air. Discussing sex is not a taboo or a sin, promiscuity is because of the unfortunate side effects of procreating, attachment of feelings, and responsibilities that are secondary like ST D's, AIDS and exploitation to name only a few. Society as a whole does accept even promote sexuality evident in role models, magazines, t.v. radio and news, morality comes in to play for the majority of people because of the consequences associated with amoral sexual behavior. Even with the potentially harmful behavior people act on those "inherent requirements" ignoring morality completely, the results, rape, child pornography, incest, adultery, disease, exploitation of both women and men, finally murder. People that are not guided with a moral compass but rather act on their instinct or desire have little or no regard for their fellow man. The only thing that matters to them is their own personal satisfaction and some will go to any length to fulfill what they want or desire at the expense of someone Else's well being. When someone is in unbearable pain or agony they want relief from their misery, I have yet to hear any patient that I have encountered in agonal pain say, no thanks I wouldn't care for the dose of medication I just plan to have sex, that will take care of this pain from my OPEN HEART SURGERY , thanks anyway! YA, RIGHT!

2006-08-29 04:45:32 · answer #5 · answered by want2flybye 5 · 0 0

Before the link with ethics, sex (precisely sexual activity) is an "animal" work which is wild, general but man transformed it into an artwork by inventing postures,processes and introduction of marriage put a brake on violent, unlimited,tortuous activity ( it often the sexual exploitation of weaklings by the strangers) called sex.
Moral ethics branded all the violations put down by society as 'adulteration". Now, so-called sexual freedom has softened all the rigidity. Compassion, not sex, is the only act which gives relief in the dark moments you uttered.

2006-08-29 04:31:27 · answer #6 · answered by saumitra s 6 · 0 0

SEX is a biological need for each living being
for pleasure. Both the partners enjoy a lot while
engaged in sexual activities.

Worlds' oldest profession relates to sex. Our
forefathers patronised it. So why attach Taboo
to it. We all know what we had done and long
to do. The problem arises, when we tell a few
persons about our extramarital acts.

The persons who make hue and cry are those
who are envious of your sexual activities, and
unable to be like you and thus spread morality-
they are hypocrates.

Sex is a true pleasure of all. So why damn it?

2006-08-29 05:07:31 · answer #7 · answered by pianist 5 · 0 0

moral ethics are attached with sex, coz though it's natural, it's the most intimate way of having fun/enjoyment/relief.
If it was not considered immoral to do sex with anybody...what would be the situation in society is imaginable. imagine a society where everybody is doing everybody.
.......disgusting it w'd be. There would be no relations at all.

2006-08-29 04:21:03 · answer #8 · answered by sameer s 4 · 1 0

Do you remember the story of adam and eve? At first they enjoyed all the luxuries in life in the garden of eden provided they should not eat one fruit. However, the snake tempted them to do so, and then they disobeyed. The fruit that was referred to was "sex". Then God got mad at them and they were sent out of the garden and told them to sweat on all the blessings that they will enjoy in life and the reward for their unbearable pain and agony will be sex at the end of the day with your wife or husband only.

2006-08-29 04:45:45 · answer #9 · answered by shirley a 1 · 0 0

Sex isn't essential. You don't need it to live. It is a choice. A choice two people make after there is some type of connection who want to further that connection to another level.

The moral implications are attached because usually the act of sex is linked to love. Love is linked to marriage and relationships.

You don't need sex to live, no matter how ***** you are.

2006-08-29 04:19:54 · answer #10 · answered by Jon H 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers