Were the nails driven in Jesus's hands or wrists?

Question

Tell me what you think and why???

by the way... I do read the bible. It says the Hands... but people say the hands couldn't support the weight. So I guess I'm just curious what people think.

Answer 1

There is some indication from historical research that they bound his wrists to the cross beam, and hammered the nails in his palms.Remember, the goal of Crucifixion was to make an example of the person, and the Romans were past masters at torture.There are more nerve endings in the hands than there are in the wrists.Also, in several cases of people with the Stigmata, they have wounds in the palms of their hands.Although there is the argument for the nails being in the wrists, it is doubtful, because of the likely hood of them hitting the arteries in the wrists and the person bleeding out.A cut artery will bleed out in less than a half an hour and to get a nail large enough to secure a person to a cross beam,there is no way to get it through the wrists without compromising the arteries.Even at an angle.There is biblical evidence to support this.Luke23:44 states that Jesus' Crucifixion lasted well over 6 hours.

Answer 2

Hands

Answer 3

Wrists!
If the nails were in the hands they would tear out!
Placing the nail between the 2 bones in the wrist prevent the tearing out of the nails do to the weight of the body.

Standard Roman Crucifixion!

Answer 4

the nails were done as a function of pain and torture so i believe that it would have been the palms of his hands

this would explain the feet also.

in that time most were tied with heavy rope to the cross.

afterall crusifiction was actually pretty common as a way to punish criminals at that time. the only thing that makes the crusifiction of jesus much differant was the use of the nails...

there were some that were nailed to the cross but history has bodies to examine on them (wrists) the hands would not support the weight alone.

i believe that he was probally tied to the cross and then nailed just to cause pain. they would have don the nails in the hands so that no major viens were severed and he would not bleed to death too quickly. the same with the feet. you would not want to put a spike through the ankle of a man whom you wanted to suffer for 3 to 4 days.

it is also believed in some circles that the roman soldier that stabbed him with the speat was trying to kill him as an act of mercy, to end the pain quicker.

Answer 5

There is a divot at the base of the hands between the hands and the wrists. That is where they placed the nails. There is a wad of nerves there and that is the MOST painful place to put them. The flashy part of the hands would have torn out and HE would have fallen forward pulling HIS Feet off of the nail in them. At that time that part was considered part of the hand.

Answer 6

Lots of things say the hands. I mean when Jesus came back after the three days he showed his hands with the holes in them. I seem to recall someone mentioning to me years ago that they put them in the hands because it made it harder to breath that way. You say how can nails in hands make it hard to breath? Well think about the pain of having nails in your hands and feet to begin with. Then lifting your body do take in air and then lowering it to exhale would be more painful. Your wrists might give you more support than your hands would. So put the nails in the hands to make it all that much more painful.

Answer 7

According to John 20:27 Jesus shows His "hands" to Thomas as proof that it is Him. Since it doesn't say "wrist" I have to believe he was nailed by his hands.
But what is the difference? His sacrifice was significant despite weather he was nailed in the hand or wrist.

Answer 8

Both. First the hands and then seeing they wouldn't support the weight the wrists.

Answer 9

Most scholars believe the nails were driven into the wrists, because this is the way it was done back then. There is no reference to this aspect of the crucifixion in the Four Gospels.

Answer 10

what style of nails? Iron grew to become right into a procedures too high priced to waste on nailing petty criminals to crosses. The Roman military interior the 1st century did no longer even use iron for armor or swords. Bronze or copper nails would possibly under no circumstances have stood being pushed into and then pulled out of a wood. wood pegs make no experience the two. do no longer you think of they might have basically used some rope particularly? besides crucifiction scenes are some fictional journey in any case. you are able to stick your Jesuses to your crosses with loopy glue for all I care.