Don't you think it is funny that the only support for creationism is?

Question

The presence of holes in the theory of evolution. All theories must be refined, that doesn't mean that it is the work of a supreme being




































































































































All hail pastafarianism

John

There is a difference between theory and faith, a theory has been scientifically put through trials, yes we've seen evolution occur. We have not seen, however, the sudden appearance of a creature by divine magic.

I don't care if you're Judeo/Christian, or Druidic, the point is that Creationism can't be proven as a theory simply because the fundamentalists search meticulously through the "Bigfoot files" to find them.

Theories shall be refined, it is that simple, even if the refining of a theory is its downfall, hopefully the theory will serve a purpose in future science

And to little red, that's quantum physics, not evolutionary biology. Unlike religion science is divided so it can be explained. Very complex, I know, but attempt to grasp it and I may some day teach you.

P.S. I know all about it, it is simply a quantum superstate.

Answer 1

Creationism isn't falsifiable, so it can't be tested, and ergo, it can't claim to have evidence either for or against its assertions.


So when creationism tries to pass itself off as scientific, and it must test something, it tests evolution.

Not only is that of course silly, it's also under the false assumption that evolution and christian creationism are the only two possibilities. They think that disproving A constitutes proof of B, which of course just goes to show how little creationists understand about how science works.



Bring me any "evidence" for creationism.
Trust me, I can show you how it's all bunk very easily.

































PS:
RAmen, brother.




Take Martin S's incredibly uninformed post.
He actually did EXACTLY what the questionner accused creationism of doing.

when asked for proof OF CREATIONISM, Martin S. attempted to present DISproof OF EVOLUTION. He changed the topic.

PS: the evolution of DNA has been very well explained, and practically everything he said was nonsense anyway.

Answer 2

I'm not gonna argue, because arguing over an unknown is a paradox in that it won't get us anywhere. However, I suggest you look up String Theory and current and future testing in research facilities overseas. There are signs pointing towards the existence of other dimensions. While we are only three dimensional, there may be thousands of other dinemsions we, as humans, are unaware of and unable to detect. For example, an experiment was done last year enabling one common household item to be present in two places at once. I'd like to see your theories of evolution explain that.

Answer 3

No, there is not any data of clever layout or creationism. data for the former would be, say, an animal that technology proves has no capacity to outlive planet earth, ought to die the 2nd it meets our environment, yet, someway, lives in huge numbers and flourishes. that would desire to be fairly stable data of an intelligence making use of the existence of that creature. the easy certainty that each and each unmarried animal is unquestionably suited for existence in the international, and would die on the different planet is a minimum of suggestive data that no intelligence is mandatory to layout existence. data for the latter is even extra straightforward. the place's God? Oh, he's no longer in suited now... properly, i assume i'm able to attend...

Answer 4

You mean that and a 5000 year old myth that someone bothered to write down shortly after written language was invented.

Also, a lot of the "holes" in the Theory of Evolution that Creationists mention are not holes, but propaganda that was long ago debunked by serious scientists, but continues to be repeated over and over again by Creations so that they can feel better about their world view.

Answer 5

Okay - let's break this down to its simplest form.

You're on jury duty. The prosecution enters into evidence exhibit after exhibit - blood samples, the blood lab results showing DNA matches that of the accused, the murder weapon, left behind wallet containing driver's license, credit cards, receipts, recent paystub, etc. Witnesses are brought forth, one by one, 100s of them, all of whose testimony points to a verdict that could only be GUILTY.

You're now in the jury room. Discussions start. The physical evidence is overwhelming. In fact, there has never before in history been a case which included as many exhibits (Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc.) as this one. It is not only monumental, it is historical!

But your vote for a verdict of innocent brings a hung jury. And it is all based on the fact that you want so desperately to believe the defendant's entered plea of 'not guilty.' Your one vote against the other 11.

This is, in essence, what an evolutionist appears as. One who will believe a handful of men's UNPROVEN THEORIES (theories are hypothetical, not factual you know) against an awesome display of God's glory - exhibit after exhibit after exhibit of his glory right in front of your face your entire life - science cannot make beautiful mountains, lakes, rivers and forests! And neither can CHANCE! If we came from apes, there wouldn't be any apes! MILLIONS AND BILLIONS AND TRILLIONS of years ago - were any of your evolutionary experts around? How can they speak of things so long ago when there is no way they can reference such a time period in any way except by GUESSING?! Evolution is ALL THEORY AND NO FACT! NO FACT WHATSOEVER! ALL OPINIONS OF MEN WHO REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE CREATOR BECAUSE THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO SUBMIT TO HIM SO THEY COME UP WITH ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO EXPLAIN HIM AWAY AND THEY ARE FOOLISH ENOUGH TO BELIEVE THAT HE MIGHT ACTUALLY GO AWAY IF THEY KEEP UP THE GAME LONG ENOUGH! They make gods of themselves!

My God, Sir! Is your pride so important to you that you would lose your soul over it? God is real! And he's waiting for you to believe in him! None of your evolutionist experts nor friends will be saving your *** on judgment day. I pray you will fall upon the mercy of the court and ask God's forgiveness and receive his son Jesus (Y'shua) as your LORD and Saviour. Outside of God, you have no hope.

Answer 6

What a lot of research scientist are realizing is that macro-evolution is an impossibility. Micro-evolution, the variations within a species is going on. But Macro-evolution, one species changing into another, has never happened.

Answer 7

There is no theory of evolution - it shouldn't even exit. Unless the soup one is taken seriosly at a zillion to 1 chance. Fact.

Answer 8

Arrgh, Matey! I also like that the only "evidence" for creationism is a group of text. At least our religion is very scientific! RAmen!

Answer 9

Creationism and evolutionism are both theories, so why shouldn't they both be taught.

Then again gravity is a theory, and I don't see anybody complaining about it being taught as such...

Answer 10

You're not very intelligent, are you. There are so many holes in the evolution theory that its near ridiculous, and I'm not christian. Refining your theory will dissolve it, just watch.