If so, isn't possible that Jesus ate Mary M. out and Mary sucked JC's c**k?
2006-08-28 14:09:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They might have had a "thing," and if so they might have performed oral on one another.
2006-08-28 14:11:45 · answer #1 · answered by TheHappyGuy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I feel He was capable of what they call a platonic relationship.
Having an intimate, affection for someone, without sex. It is
said he kissed both women and men on the mouth.
Myself, I'm asexual. I don't care about it one way or the other. I get aroused like any other man. But I don't act on it. I do get some now and then. But I've also been called gay by both men and women because I don't just screw at the drop of a hat.
I'm not a dildo. I'm a MAN. And I want to be romanced and seduced. Have some feeling when I make love.
2006-08-28 21:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Very possible. That could help to explain the thing Jesus had for fish.
2006-08-28 21:43:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its perfectly possible, though the christians would never admit it.
In one of the books that was left out of the bible by the Roman Catholic Church Jesus trusted Mary over all of his male apostles. The Roman Catholic church left this out of the bible because woman are sinful and the church would lose control over thier subjects if they knew of that instance.
2006-08-28 21:13:38 · answer #4 · answered by m_thurson 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jesus had a thing. Mary didn't.
2006-08-28 21:11:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
May God have Mercy on your soul !!!! To make a statement like that about our Savior who died for Your sins is just beyond my comprehension............................. If I was God, I could never forgive you for making that statement. But you see, that's why I'm not God. His mercy is awesome !!
2006-08-28 21:45:03 · answer #6 · answered by granny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all's i can say is may god help u when the time come's. we just don't refer to jesus like that.
2006-08-28 21:13:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
you know, you didn't have to be so nasty about it, it would have been a good question but now you just sound like an idiot!
2006-08-28 21:19:11 · answer #8 · answered by wifeofsickening 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wow.....Well if they were indeed married, I guess its possible. I cant believe you would think to ask this.....
2006-08-28 21:13:01 · answer #9 · answered by Christina H 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
there's no evidence for such thing.
2006-08-28 21:12:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋