English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

am the 4th in my family, my name is Joseph Anthony the IV. My wife and I are having a debate whether to keep this tradtion going. I think I want to, although i am not a big fan of the name joseph, i love the name anthony so we would call him anthony, his middle name. My wife does not like the idea. She says she just doesnt like numbering kids (she is a teacher if you cant tell) this is an issue we are having difficulty agreeing on. What do outsiders think looking in. Should we continue our tradition, or move on? We have defintily decided we are going to call him anthony, but my wife wants his middle name to be dillon, which is her family name. She says this way we are combining both of our families traditions not just mine. Thanks for any input...

2006-08-28 09:25:38 · 22 answers · asked by tmess9 2 in Family & Relationships Family

22 answers

I think your wife's idea is fantastic. Im with her: numbering names is so unoriginal.But she is compromiseing by letting you use the name anthony and adding dillion. I think its great. Remember marriage is about compromise and i think this is a great way to show your wife that you love her and her family.

2006-08-28 09:38:00 · answer #1 · answered by luv2bactin 2 · 0 0

I am probably the wrong person to answer this question, but I am anyway. My dad did not want me to be a JR so my middle name is his first name. When my son was born, I did not want him to be a JR either, so his middle name is my first name. Does this make sense? I am not a big fan of the number scene, like you I think Anthony is a great name and Anthony Dillon sounds even better. I like the idea of starting a new tradition. Just another fun fact, my daughter is Erin Melissa and she named her daughter Melissa Jade, so the tradition goes on. Good luck.

2006-08-28 15:31:13 · answer #2 · answered by morris 5 · 0 0

That's a tough situtation. You'll just have to hash it out. Both names are very nice. Maybe you can give the child two middle names - Joseph Anthony Dillon. Keep in mind that it really doesn't matter what the families want, it's what the two of you decide to do. Good luck.

2006-08-28 09:32:48 · answer #3 · answered by LJ 4 · 0 0

I have an ex-nephew who is John Andrew V. I really like the idea of continuing the tradition. You can always save Dillon for a second son and that son can continue his own tradition. I understand how your wife feels, but I personally feel that breaking tradition would be a cause of regret for you later on. But that's just my opinion.

2006-08-28 09:33:47 · answer #4 · answered by pessimoptimist 5 · 0 0

I can see both sides, however I personally would break with tradition. 4 is enough of any one person's name in a family.

I knew a guy who went by (as an example) J. Bennett Blahblah. The "J" was short for Jonnathan (yes that WAS the spelling) the same first name that had been in the family for 20 generations - EVERY male child got named Jonnathan (middle name) Blahblah, so everyone went by their middle name (everyone, including his wife, called him Ben - short for Bennett).
That is an extreme example, but it illustrates why EVERYONE in my opinion needs their own name and their own identity.

Its rough enough as it is going through life being an extension of someone else..... So-and-so's son, La-te-da's husband, Jojo's father, Mike-mike's cousin's brother's uncle, etc.

2006-08-28 09:43:01 · answer #5 · answered by Brutally Honest 7 · 0 0

Family is a very important thing. Not only is he carrying on a name but he is carrying on the memory of your father, grand father, ect. You can always give him two middle names. That way your wife will be satisfied also. Please remeber that being an Anthony is a very special thing and and being the fifth in line is even more special.

2006-08-28 09:36:36 · answer #6 · answered by lunitari601 3 · 0 0

I think that family is so important and someday you will want your son to have your name. But Anthony Dillon is a very nice name.

2006-08-28 09:29:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Go ahead and name him Joseph, but leave off the number. When he gets older and decides to add the V. then that will be his choice. Let his middle name be Dillin to compromise with your Wife.

2006-08-28 09:37:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

properly, alongside with your daughter it is of course going to be Hardin, and what i might do is save a gentle volume of custom and do something your way. Like... Delia Katy Hardin Lisa Katherine Hardin Lisa Emily Hardin destiny Anne Hardin Kathy Amelia Hardin Bethany Christine Hardin Cassandra Eden Hardin * And in any case, you have already broken the custom so won't your baby in simple terms experience the comparable and alter her call and confuse truthfully all human beings? and he or she might ask the type you broke the custom interior the kin and be disillusioned you probably did no longer think of of her call? yet while your loved ones are fairly gentle and strict, decide to your closest member of kin, like a sister or cousin, and tell them approximately it first and ask how they had do it and ask them that should assist you tell something of the kin. And in the event that they nevertheless experience aggravated, forget approximately it. the sensation will die while they grow to be grand-mothers and fathers and grand-uncles. * Cassandra is almost a mixture of Elizabeth, Katherine and Anne, Eden is like Emily and the letter D. and clearly Hardin is the surname. So in my opinion i might call my baby Cassandra Eden or Eden Cassandra and get in touch with her Cass.

2016-10-01 00:27:53 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Keep the tradition

2006-08-28 09:28:56 · answer #10 · answered by drsteve362005 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers