2006-08-28 08:36:12 · 11 answers · asked by carl 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No. Science just hasn't figured it out yet.
2006-08-28 08:38:09 · answer #1 · answered by ada wong 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, I suppose that's how a lot of people look at it, I personally see a lot of scientifically explainable things as miracles - birth for instance.
What I'm saying is, God wrote the laws of nature, He knows how to use them, I think most of what God does is perfectly scientifically explainable, it's just that He knows a lot more science than we do, so us humans don't know how to explain all of it yet, so we call it a miracle.
But I think just because something is explainable doesn't make it any less of a miracle, and just because we can't explain it, doesn't mean that an explanation doesn't exist.
2006-08-28 15:50:59 · answer #2 · answered by daisyk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what type. There have been some things that could not be explained by medicine at that time but were not true miracles. Sometimes they are.
2006-08-28 15:38:34 · answer #3 · answered by Fashionvista 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. just because it is unexplained now, does not mean it will be unexplained in a hundred years. a miracle "cannot" be explained.
2006-08-28 15:44:12 · answer #4 · answered by Tom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Miracles are attributed to an invisible, fairytale being who lives in the sky.
2006-08-28 15:41:09 · answer #5 · answered by Klawed Klawson 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that's the case, then FIRE was a miracle once.
I'm pretty sure that it's not anymore.
So either the premise is bad,
Or science is slaying god.
(I believe the former, mind you)
2006-08-28 15:40:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miracles performed by Jesus were neither - they were the power of God.
2006-08-28 15:38:30 · answer #7 · answered by TJMiler 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
an aeroplane would have seemed to be a miracle once..............so we probably have a lot to learn yet;
2006-08-28 15:42:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree with ada_wong
2006-08-28 15:42:38 · answer #9 · answered by ever_curious 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-08-28 15:38:27 · answer #10 · answered by Jay P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋