i know why you think abortion is wrong, what i want to know is why you think you have the right to take others peoples rights away? and why is it your business? that is point i'm getting at.
2006-08-28 08:01:53 · 11 answers · asked by tandypants 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They're so absorbed in their self-righteousness, they're never going to get your question.
2006-08-28 08:12:13 · answer #1 · answered by Allison L 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm not against abortion because it is my business. I'm, fulfilling God's business. Not mine. Therefore, I will make it my business. I believe in God and God's Word, You don't. Who are you to declare there is NO God, and none of my business? You and I, have to live on the same earth for now. We can be friends or not. You and I, can play in the same sandbox, until you want to splash. Then, I may splash back.
State Laws on Abortion, in regards to Funeral Home Directors, by: The Department of Human Services.
It is wrong according too man and Christianity.
1.) When a fetus weighs 11.3 ounces, or 20 weeks of term, whichever comes first. The baby dies, it has to have a Birth Certification and Death Certificate.
2.) When a fetus is less than 350 Grams and dies, it needs a Fetus Death Certificate.
3.) A fetus/baby is a live human being after it meets the above criteria, according too law.
4.) a nonlife needs no Death Certificate. [ It had to be a Life, to be declared dead.]
5.) A baby is a live human being even according too man, and will remain so, until man's law changes.
6.) By man's own definition as too Life: You tell me who is contradicting themselves.
7.) A fetus/baby is a live human being at conception, according to God, and will remain that way until YOU or someone else proves with the Word of GOD, that it isn't.
Now...Even according to MAN...it is hypocritical to have an abortion. According to God, it absolutley is.
Either way...it is wrong. God has His mind made up. Man is the fumbleweed with a double standard.
Good Question.
..
2006-08-28 16:42:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Supreme Court in Roe vs Wade said the government has a right to control abortions after the first trimester. It had a greater right during the third trimester.
It is against the law to kill a one day old infant. How much different is the child 72 hours earlier?
Morality exists regardless of religion. The people have a right to protect children.
2006-08-28 15:57:48 · answer #3 · answered by Woody 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
But is it the mother's right? Where do the mother's rights end & the child's rights to live begin? I believe that the child's rights begin from the time it begins to live. From the time it becomes a foetus. Pro life is not about taking rights away from the mother. It is about defending the rights of a defenseless life that has rights but that cannot fend or know to make the decision for itself.
So actually, the person who aborts are actually the person who is taking away a person's rights.(the child's). The person who is against it is protecting rights.
2006-08-28 15:32:08 · answer #4 · answered by Ethslan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't we take other murderers rights away? Why should an abortionist be any different. Pro- choice is pro-murder, right? So, the law says that murder is wrong and deserves consequences. In essence, all women that have had abortions should be in prison or on death row since they committed murder.
It is my business because once there is no longer anything wrong with abortion, anyone can argue that there is nothing wrong with any other murder that has been committed.
2006-08-28 15:12:19 · answer #5 · answered by lovergirl 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Haha, well that blew up! I can understand how people seem to think it isn't a right by relating it to murder. If you are from that viewpoint, you cannot murder and thus you cannot abort.
However, if you read my answer to your earlier question, I don't think it's alive until birth, until then it's a part of your body and thus more of an issue.
hmsolbach, how do you compare choice to murder? They are too completly different words! No one says, "well that's your murder" nor do you get tried in court for "choice". That was a very simplistic statement that only shows you are following someone else's words without thinking about them. Under that same logic, how are many Pro-lifers also in support of teh death penalty? (Note I didn't say all or even most, but just as many are as aren't).
2006-08-28 15:11:56 · answer #6 · answered by Battousai 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have the right, because the unborn baby does not, someone has to try and protect them. It's my business, because Murder is against the the law, killing is killing rather unborn or born, life is life. Roe Vs. Wade made this public domain, whether we like it or not. How sad that it's even open for discussion. God Bless!!
2006-08-28 15:28:29 · answer #7 · answered by Annie Red Head 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The right to injury, murder or deny another life is part of a community standard. Think slavery...the US Supreme court decided that Africans were a "sub-species" of humans not worthy of equal protection in law. Women were considered sub par to men in voting and rights under our government.
Many, many people fought these unjust laws and took plantation owners economic animals away from them, and took the rights of husbands to control their wives.
The unborn child is simply another class of humanity being abused by another human. It becomes my business when one person or group of persons believe and enact into civil law that their rights are superior to others. When in fact this violates our constitution.
Your point is simply outdated, barbaric and failed in past examples. Open your mind and be enlighten to the truth about murder.
2006-08-28 15:14:05 · answer #8 · answered by Lives7 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What about the rights of the baby and the father and the grand parents?Its the whole worlds business, when we kill off potential wage earner that would pay taxes and make contributions to society.
2006-08-28 15:18:24 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
they don't think they are taking anyone eLse's rights away, they think they are protecting peopLe's rights.
do peopLe have the right to steaL? no.
Likewise peopLe don't have the right to murder, so it depends on if abortion is murder whether or not peopLe have the right to do it.
2006-08-28 15:14:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What about the baby's rights? You want to take them away.
2006-08-28 16:11:03 · answer #11 · answered by pennypincher 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋