He definitely won't go down as being the best president in U.S. history. However, he is doing what he feels is best and strongly supports the troops and his cause. Bush has had to endure many more trials and tribulations compared to most former Commander and Chiefs that served. The general public is so misinformed about things and the liberal media has alot to do with this. The news has a great way of painting things in a negative light and people just jump on the 'hate Bush bandwagon' without knowing all of the facts. Overall, I believe that Bush is decent.
2006-08-28 10:09:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by JistheRealDeal 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
He's a good president. He's not the best, but not even close to the worst. It's been much better to serve under him than the previous one.
P.S. There's no way his "haters" are going to let this be "just military".
EDIT: Im sorry teejay, but you can't speak for us. We all have free will and think for ourselves. I fully support a president who stands his ground. For all non-supporters....just remember, if we don't fight on foreign soil, then we fight on American soil. Perhaps you prefer another WTC??
iknowtruth....you ask questions about who to thank leaving an orgy and you have the gull to criticize our president?? What a laugh!! Than again, I'm sure you'd fit right in with Clinton's sex games at the White House.
2006-08-28 08:55:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by HEartstrinGs 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
SIR: Considering all that has gone on... I feel that he has done a good job overall. One thing about him is his moral compass. He never deviates from it and he stands on moral ground. As our commander-in-chief, I have no complaints.
Second of all, sir, with all due respect, I am not convinced that he did lie! Some of the intelligence might have been smudged to give him what he wanted, but we are not in a position to know that! Connecting him directly to the fact that the intelligence was fabricated is hard since he did not create the intelligence and we have no proof that he ordered false intelligence to be created. Blaming him without knowing the full, truthful and complete story is no better than what you are accusing our commander of doing (making assumptions without all of the correct information)!
In the long run, it does not matter because our leader was chosen by the rules written under the Constitution of the United States. As a military member (rank not given) it is not our position to judge our leader openly in the public. It is our job to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and to simply obey the orders of those appointed over us. George W. Bush is my commander-in-chief; as a military member, I will enforce the orders given to me from him through the US Congress (who authorized force as they were asked).
2006-08-28 15:04:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kevin 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Some one asked me the other day if I had to do it all over again would I enlist in the military. I said yes because we have a president that cares for the troops and wants us to succede in all things. Maybe that is a little foolish of me but President Bush did bring the morale of the troops up unlike the president before him.
2006-08-28 19:49:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by fatboysdaddy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
from reading these posts. i can only assume that the military doesnt allow you guys to read any free press?? where in the hell have you all been????????? almost 3000 kids have died and oveR 20k wounded. from attacking and currently occupying a foreign nation that had nothing to do with 9/11!! bush lied and manipulated intelligence to justify his plan. i still remember how the military can and will brainwash people so i will discount most of the statements. and especially since any subversive remarks about the commander in chief is technically a violation of the ucmj articles 30/31. i am a civilian now so i will say what i think you guys want to say but are too afraid too!!! BUCK FUSH!!!!!!
2006-08-28 12:43:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think his heart is in the right place, but being advised by some people with ulterior motives.
He certainly needs to be more diplomatic in his relationships with other nations.
He's over his head in this position, much like Dan Quayle was. But I would take him as a neighbor.
2006-08-28 12:15:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by amish-robot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Military brat. All the way behind the Chief.
2006-08-28 07:59:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
not something in charge and no one changed into being investigated. in simple terms requested to justify their tax exempt status and by using agencies which have frequently preached about the illegality of the IRS, which have recommended the violent overthrow of the U. S. authorities (certain, that's what secession is) and performance a historic previous of abusing their tax exempt status by using. This "Obama blames bush" cr*p is getting extremely old. You adult men look in a position to make up lies on the drop of the hat. Why can't you come back up with a sparkling meme to bore us with?
2016-11-28 02:48:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very good Commander-in-Chief!!!!
2006-08-28 07:47:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush was chosen by God to smite those secular devils!
2006-08-28 07:52:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋