2006-08-28 06:48:34 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
terrorists get one thing, a bullet between the eyes.
2006-08-28 06:53:48 · answer #1 · answered by digital genius 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes we should. And here is why.
What is much more certain and important is that a refusal to negotiate indicates rejection of the other side, and rejection creates serious physical and psychological obstacles to problem solving, because it prevents clear communication from taking place, and it guarantees defensiveness and resistance to change. We simply need to make it clear that a decision to negotiate does not mean acceptance of the other side’s behavior. We can in fact love our enemies and hate what they do, but to prove it we need to act in loving ways by accepting their humanity enough to negotiate for mutual gains. Each side need get no more than that to which they are entitled. And we need to remember that regardless of how we respond, there are no guaranteed results, except that forced agreements are always very unstable.
2006-09-03 08:17:42 · answer #2 · answered by leckie1UK 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ask any of the Americans who were beheaded. Do you really think there was a negotiation? These animals deserve only one thing - death and annihilation.
2006-09-04 21:12:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never negotiate with terrorists.
2006-08-31 18:25:21 · answer #4 · answered by JAMES11A 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Arrogance needs to be left to the dimwits.
If Governments would actually sit down and LISTEN to other people views...maybe just maybe...the world would get somewhere.
Just remember who really IS the terrorist.
2006-08-28 13:54:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No ! Time for talking is over.. especially in the middle east. Spent far too much time blah blah blah'ing ..and the carry on is still going on..
2006-09-05 06:43:26 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should just pretend to do what they say , like if they want to have a prisoner released , sure release him with a small bomb up his *** . As soon as we get our people , we blow theirs up . Lie to them , who cares , i would do anything to save our american hostages . just as long as we kill the retards who took our people in the first place
2006-08-28 13:56:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, but only to a certain extent cause if they just ignore and attack it will only piss off the terrorists, they see themselves as a religious goverment if every one tries to keep them quiet they just get louder and louder.
2006-08-28 14:17:17 · answer #8 · answered by sikn_shadow_420 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, but just long enough to get them out in the open so they can shoot them.
2006-09-01 17:20:07 · answer #9 · answered by JOHN 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. To do so legitimizes terrorism and encourages them to do more.
2006-09-05 11:54:39 · answer #10 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋