Your argument has a lot of holes in it. Check the links below for detailed rebuttals. But before that, consider these questions-
1. If Bush/the government just wanted to restrict civil liberties and start a war, why didn't they use a much less disastrous attack? They could have blown up the Statue of Liberty, causing fewer casualties and less financial loss, and still would have had an excellent excuse to enact the Patriot Act and invade "terrorist" states.
2. Why would such a diabolical scheme be so poorly planned? Why would the government and Bush appear so weak immediately after the attack, and leave so many loose ends that half the people on Yahoo think it's a conspiracy?
3. Why hasn't the government deleted the Loose Change video and started snuffing out Alex Jones and Dylan Avery? (A point made by Maddox in the bottom link)
2006-08-28 03:02:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by timm1776 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
You can say that insults just mean we can't handle the truth, but I could care less what you think and you're a huge idiot for buying into this stuff. As I've said before, even most of the biggest Bush haters don't believe he was behind it! Why? Because they're smart and know there was no reason for him to do something so stupid.
You just make yourself look like an idiot, so keep buying into this, because I certainly like a laugh from postings such as this one.
2006-08-28 04:45:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Naples_6 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
a couple of actual facts
In 2001 Bush promised to freeze all terrorist funds. Up to this day Bin ladens money is sitting happily in US accounts through various investment groups.
on 9/11 one plane was allowed to leave after all other were grounded. The Bin laden family Jet.
The Department of justice and FBI have tried researching some of the investment funds and companies owned by the Saudi Bin Laden group(officially owned by his brothers but its his money) even some chemical plants. Only to be halted by the CIA.
Al Quaeda was started, funded and traine by the CIA
the CIA still has business dealings with banks of the Saoudi Bin Laden group.
If you ask me there's an office in Langley Virginia marked Osama Bin Laden!!
Just assumptions don't make a good case as I said these are FACTS.
2006-08-28 03:04:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by peter gunn 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Do you set up you booth beside the Scientology's or closer to the "My babies father is an alien" stand? I really don't have to much more to say but there is an old saw that goes that if three people call you a jackass maybe you should check into where to get a bridle and halter.
2006-08-28 20:28:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too many movies...too many video games.
I can say I gave birth to an alien love child and have pictures doctored up by photoshop, make a couple articles, post them in a blog, sell it to the National Enquirer and make loads of money and believe.
I'm not saying you are right...not saying you are wrong. Two sides to every tale...and to believe what one person says is just plain dumb.
and the thing with Cuba...yeah dude...that is whack.
2006-08-28 03:18:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
At first I thought "Oh, Just another nut job conspiracy theorist", but then I read your blog. When I realized that you had such expert testimony supporting your case like Charlie Sheen, I knew you were really on to something. I think you should gather up all your evidence and take it to the F.B.I. We just can't have presidents blowing up buildings.
2006-08-28 02:57:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by RunningOnMT 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Charlie Cokehead Prostitute-Connoisseur Sheen as *validation*? Are you kidding?? Nice try.
2006-08-28 05:05:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by georgia b 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
2006-08-28 02:52:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by kristycordeaux 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Arent Mulder and Scully on that case?
2006-08-31 13:41:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by riommar73 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not worthy of a response. I'll just take the two points.
2006-08-30 06:56:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by JAMES11A 4
·
0⤊
0⤋