Did it ever occur to people that money spent on immigrants and immigration (legal or not) is not "money well spent." Did it ever occur to anyone that, like war or not, money spent on it is validated? Please research the contrast between the economy and war before answering with a mal attitude.
2006-08-28
02:08:19
·
6 answers
·
asked by
?
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
The majority of questions I have asked and answered always have that one person who sites the war in lue of immigration. I am bringing my finding to everyones attention but then I am called the stupid one. lol See, my point exactly. Do you actually think I am the only person who views war and immigration this way? I'm sorry, you are the immigrant (legal or not) so I have to be hospitable and agree with your point of view "just because". And by the way the WAR HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IMMIGRATION! This has been my point the whole time...yet people are still answering this question stupidly. Wars are known to break recessions! If you are legal you took "the test" and should know this, however, this leads me to my other point...immigrants, in general...are not versed on American history.
2006-08-28
02:37:48 ·
update #1
Food for thought: Soldiers are dying in the war...they are dying believing in the cause and doing it with vigor.
In Los Angelas alone 95% of warrants for murder are for illegal aliens. The guy that was stabbed and killed for his pocket money did not want to die...was not fighting for a cause.
Who pays for crime? Who pays for inmates in jails? Who pays for law inforcement? Who pays the FBI and INS and the thousand other related links? This is not even siting the medical care, food and housing.
With this...I am supposed to believe that I am a "dolt" who is trying to sound intelectual? Quite frankley I can use common sense and see that the total cost of the war and immigration (and all its related costs) are probably neck and neck. If I had to choose which one to cut off...it would be the immigrants. Sorry. Its better to pay for one than the other. In a perfect world it would be better to pay for none...again, given the choice, immigrants would be gone.
2006-08-28
02:58:52 ·
update #2