English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Stones developed in gall bladder detected in ultrasound but not painful also require surgical removal or they may remain without causing any trouble.

2006-08-27 22:47:47 · 6 answers · asked by kumar pramod 1 in Health Diseases & Conditions Other - Diseases

6 answers

This depends on the remainder of the anatomy around the gallstones. If the gall bladder shows no sign of disease and if the stones are not problematic, surgery should not be necessary. There are techniques to dissolve the stones using sonic waves, so ask your doctor about that. This is a non-invasive technique with little or no side effects.


Good luck!

Will D
Enterprise AL
http://www.notagz.com

2006-08-27 22:56:13 · answer #1 · answered by Will D 4 · 0 0

Usually you will need to have them out. The problem is that the gall stones move to block the bile ducts, this can be exacerbated with spicy food. When your gall bladder becomes too inflamed from this, it can no longer be removed via the three small incisions and requires far more recovery time, and a large abdominal scar from the incision

A very small percentage of folks who have their gall bladder removed have difficulty with fatty foods afterward. (gives em the runs)

The first symptoms of gall stones is mild indigestion, progressing to back pain following eating, nausea, vomiting (which does make you feel better) . If your doctor says it is time to have it out, then don't wait too long or you will have a large scar across your middle, and a much longer recovery time.

2006-08-27 22:56:38 · answer #2 · answered by Silvatungfox 4 · 0 0

I've had both and I would have to say the kidney stones were worse and that that probably holds true for most ppl. I'm basing this on the patients that I have taken care of in the past; the ones with kidney stones always seem to be in more pain than the ones with gall stones.

2016-03-17 03:39:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Have the stones removed. Mine was not painful and I did not know I had the stone. Very easy surgery. fast recovery from the surgery. I did not think I needed the surgery but I just got sicker and sicker. They can possibly cause other problems, I now have nonalcholic fatty liver disease and may someday have to have a transplant. Have the doctor check your liver function also. We don't know for sure if all caused by stone but we wish we had the surgery sooner, just in case. Good luck.

2006-08-28 05:20:07 · answer #4 · answered by meemaw 2 · 0 0

Avoid tomatoes, Prefer cabbage

Drink the juice of raw banana stem

In no time all the stones will melt and come out of your system

Hence there may not be any need for surgical intervention!

2006-08-27 22:59:39 · answer #5 · answered by guru_raghavan 2 · 0 0

Definately not leave them alone unless they bother you, don't eat any peanuts. my doctor gave me that advice just last week I have 3 smal stones.

2006-08-27 23:07:11 · answer #6 · answered by Michael 5 · 0 0

Its an elective surgery ..... you can leave it unattended but then one day unbearable pain would errupt and you would suffer a lot

2006-08-27 22:54:33 · answer #7 · answered by Sudden 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers