is energy can be created?i studied that free power is generated ? how is it possible?

Answer 1

It is not hard to believe that matter can not be
> created nor destroyed just transfered to a different form.
> What is hard is believing that energy can not be created nor
> destroyed. Since matter can just be transfered to energy,
> what does the energy get transfred to? With all the new
> people being born where did their energy come from?
>
> For simplicity lets say that we can measure the amount of
> energy, and this being all types of energy. say yesterday
> the earth had 5 units of energy. so then by the law of
> conservation they earth has 5 units of energy today, it will
> have 5 units of energy tomorrow, and it has had 5 unit of
> energy since it's creation. now if this is true how is it
> that the population of the earth continues to grow? if the
> law was true then the energy required for a baby to be born
> and live its entire life would have had to have been reformed
> from some where else (this also says that the future has
> already been decided and there is no free will, but that is a
> different discussion). so this is saying that some thing is
> losing (different from being destroyed) its energy to supply
> all the new borns with the energy required.
>
> the law states for a closed system. it is easy to see how
> the earth is not a closed system with the sun and all. so
> what about the solar system. well energy could be
> transferred from other solar systems in the galaxy. but
> there are other galaxies in the universe. so to get a closed
> system lets look and the universe (if you wish to bring in
> the multiverse theory then we can look at the oniverse (sum
> of all) either way it will still be the same). so if we can
> measure all the energy we could say that the universe had
> 10,000 units yesterday, has today, will tomorrow, and has had
> though out time (for now I won't go into where that 10,000
> units came from).
>
> so in this closed system something is losing energy so we can
> over populate earth. now one could say that gathering all
> the energy that each star puts would probable be more then
> enough energy for each plant (assuming that there is other
> life in the universe which would be dumb not to) to continue
> their existence. now as a star grows (from blue dwarf,
> yellow med, red giant) it gets bigger and gives off more
> energy. so this could explain where all the continual energy
> comes from for over population. but as the sun grows it also
> needs more energy. now assuming that each star is generally
> the same (meaning like people the grow, die, and during give
> off on average the same amount of energy respectfully during
> each stage of their lives), what is losing the energy needed
> for the stars to grow?
>
> it could be argued that there is an proportionate number of
> stars in each of their life cycle so that the older ones are
> supplying for the younger and the meds are supplying for the
> younger. but if this is so then all the energy that is lost
> (again different from destroyed) is gained by another star
> instead of say an over populated plant. so if we assume that
> there is an equivalent about of stars there could be an
> equivalent amount of life (this being all life except that of
> stars but including man/E.T. made things).
>
> so with and equivalent amount of life the energy that each
> being loses goes to another that gains. this would suggest
> that as we are over populating there are others that are
> dying. if this is so then as say one plant over populates to
> much and needs to move to another plant (ex: us going to the
> moon and continue to over populate) then another place (or
> numerous place) had to have lost the amount of energy for
> each new being born at any given time.
>
> now we could believe that plants are being suddenly destroy
> or damaged and the energy that is lost is then transferred
> (the energy is probable not transferred directly but probable
> goes though many different forms) to those that gain it.
> this is a bit hard to believe. we could say that there is an
> proportionate amount of beings in their cycles of their life
> like as with the stars. so this could go to say that other
> plants had to have large jumps in evolution (this being more
> for man/E.T. made things) and growth for the other plants to
> evolve at a slower rate but still grow at a near exponential
> rate. with this theory one could assume that since
> cataclysms happen (plants colliding, space rocks impacting,
> ect..) that could account for the sudden bust of evolution
> and growth as far as scientist can determine a sudden growth
> like that (which would have to be proportionate it to that of
> the cataclysm) has not happened and is not very likely to
> happen. so what gains from that large lost of energy?
>
> we could say that the large lost of energy from life could be
> used to allow stars to be born. if this was true then there
> would not be a proportionate amount of stars (since as a star
> dies the energy lost would go to a new one being born). this
> could be explained two ways.
>
> 1) during the life of a star it loses the excite amount of
> energy that is needed for all life (this also includes
> plants) in its solar system. this could then mean that each
> solar system is a closed system once it has been created. if
> this was true then solar systems would have to be dying and
> being born at the same time. but if just two plants collide
> and the star is still going what happens. I could be that
> the energy from the plants created a solar system from their
> lost of energy, though it would have to be a very small one.
>
> 2) that when the universe was created not all 10,000 units
> were used, but some of the units would be static energy (that
> being energy that is not used in any way buy anything,
> similar to potential and kinetic). so this can so that there
> isn't a need for any huge jump in evolution or growth. but
> since death seems to be more catastrophic the energy that is
> lost because of that may not need to be gained by, anything
> but rather sits as static energy until it is needed. this
> also means that there wouldn't need to be a proportionate
> amount of life or stars since static energy can be used for
> over populating areas and static energy can be increased by
> that of cataclysms.
>
> there are many mysteries of the universe (I mean the ones
> other then women). for example black holes. as far as can
> be told about theses they take everything in. does this mean
> every and all type of energy? if so then if there really is
> static energy this could be one way that the static energy
> reserve is increased.

Answer 2

The first law of thermodynamics states that energy can not be created nor destroyed.

You can only transform energy from one form to another. I'll just give you an example of energy transformation.

From the chemical reaction of oxygen and coal (combustion) energy is transformed from chemical to another in the form heat. The generated heat during combustion is then absorbed by water in a steam generator commonly called boiler.

Water then boils out and its molecules would expand increasing its temperature, kinetic energy and pressure, internal energy which when you sum up all these energies it is called the enthalpy or total energy.

Steam at high temperature and pressure is then admitted to the turbine through nozzles. The turbine will then transform enthalpy into mechanical energy to turn the generator,.

The generator will transform this mechanical energy into electrical energy which will be distributed by trasmission lines to the end user. It maybe industrial or residential for further transformation in terms of light, heat, mechanical etc. etc..

In physics, thermodynamic free energy means the total energy which could be converted to do work. It is impossible for all the energies be converted into work due friction losses and or temperature gradients.

Answer 3

You neither can create nor can destroy energy ( Law of conservation of energy). However you can create energy from one form to another. I am sure you will be awarded Nobel Prize if in case you succeed to generate power freely. But It is only possible if everything becomes available free on this earth.

Answer 4

No, energy cannot be created.
What type of power, you have studied, is generated free? It is not possible. Something hidden might not be taken into account by you.

Answer 5

Energy cannot be created or destroyed it can change forms !

I didnt exactly understaand what u meant by "free power".
If you are asking about how to generate power without cost it can be Tidal (means wind causing movement ) or Hydro (means water causing movement) nd this movement can be used to convert mechanical energy to electrical energy !

If u want a detail and simple explanation i can give u still !

Answer 6

strap a mouse on a wheel, use the wheel to power a small generator. Connect the generator to a light bulb, then whip the mouse with a shoestring. Wah~~La~~~ Free energy.

Answer 7

Well. Nothing comes out free as the saying goes. Am not sure. There can be no free power... It can only be converted from one form to another.

Answer 8

Did you read that free power HAS BEEN generated in a real, working device? Or did you read that it is THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE to generate free power? These are not the same thing.

Answer 9

Reserves advance dramatically while the value is going up. Breader reactors are very effective and that ought to make the value of the Uranium particularly minor in assessment to the value of producing capability from it. It nevertheless is a minor value. the certainty that France is socialists would not have something to do with nuclear capability getting used. that's not used via fact each and every of the recent flowers have been effectively close down by making use of environmentalists.

Answer 10

Energy can't be created or destroyed but can only be converted from one form to another
for ex : only when we do a work we can earn money .Who would give us a salary when we do no work?

Answer 11

care to provide a source?

matter/energy cannot be created or destroyed, the goal is to change it into a form we can use with as little cost as possible.