I have heard both, does anyone have any real answer?
2006-08-27 13:55:21 · 6 answers · asked by missjuly15 2 in Health ➔ Other - Health
Bare feet. The baby learns to walk through tactile contact with the ground. Also better for development of the foot. Shoes are good for areas that may have sharp objects you can't see.
2006-08-27 13:59:14 · answer #1 · answered by Pookie's mom 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess it would be better to learn to walk without shoes. Im thinking of the extra weight having to be carried around. Keep it simple for the child in question, the seasons should be your best indicator, if it is too cold, then wear shoes, if not go barefoot.
Neither is right or wrong, good luck.
2006-08-27 14:01:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They say its better to go bare foot, I only put mine in shoes when we were going out, otherwise she was barefoot or in socks with the no slip grippies on the bottom.
2006-08-27 14:02:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not put good shoes on the baby??? It makes sense to me!!!
2006-08-27 14:05:31 · answer #4 · answered by winona e 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My pediatrician recommended bare feet, but I dont think shoes will do harm either.
2006-08-27 13:57:21 · answer #5 · answered by kitty.hicks 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Shoes help them balance better.
2006-08-27 13:57:57 · answer #6 · answered by gemm77 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋